UFR 3-34 References
References
- Greenblatt D, Paschal KB, Yao C-S, Harris J, Schaeffler NW and Washburn AE (2006) Experimental Investigation of Separation Control Part 1: Baseline and Steady Suction. AIAA Journal 44(12): 2820-2830.
- Naughton JW, Viken S, Greenblatt D (2006) Skin-Friction Measurements on NASA Hump Model. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1255-1265.
- Langley Research Center Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control, USA, March 29-31 (2004): https://cfdval2004.larc.nasa.gov/case3expdata.html
- ATAAC: Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic Application Challenges. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/twiki/bin/view/ATAAC/WebHome
- Go4Hybrid: Grey Area Mitigation for Hybrid RANS-LES Methods. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://go4hybrid.mace.manchester.ac.uk/go4hybrid/bin/view/Main/WebHome
- Uzun A, Malik MR (2015) Wall-Resolves Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Separation over NASA Wall-Mounted Hump. AIAA Paper 2017-0538.
- NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/nasahump_val.html
- Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2018) 2D Wall-Mounted Hump. (2018). In: Mockett C, Haase W, Schwamborn D (eds) Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (Results of a Seventh Framework EU Project) 134: 173-187.
- Probst A, Schwamborn D, Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2017) Evaluation of Grey Area Mitigation Tools within Zonal and Non-Zonal RANS-LES Approaches in Flows with Pressure Induced Separation. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow. In press.
10. Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, Squires KD, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2006) New version of Detached-eddy Simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 20(3): 181–195. 11. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2015) An Enhanced Version of DES with Rapid Transition from RANS to LES in Separated Flows. Flow Turbulence and Combustion 95: 709-737. 12. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2008) A Hybrid RANS-LES Approach with Delayed-DES and Wall-Modelled LES Capabilities. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow (29): 1638-1649. 13. Shur, ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2014) Synthetic Turbulence Generators for RANS-LES Interfaces in Zonal Simulations of Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Problems. Flow Turbulence and Combustion (93): 63-92. 14. Jarrin N, Prosser R, Uribe, J, Benhamadouche S, Laurence D (2009) Reconstruction of turbulent fluctuations for hybrid RANS/LES Simulations Using a Synthetic-Eddy method. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 30: 435–442. 15. Probst A (2016) Implementation and Assessment of the Synthetic-Eddy Method in an Unstructured Compressible Flow Solver. 6th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, Strasbourg, France, 2628 September 2016. 16. Probst A, Löwe J, Reuß S, Knopp T, Kessler R (2016) Scale-Resolving Simulations with a LowDissipation Low-Dispersion Second-Order Scheme for Unstructured Flow Solvers. AIAA Journal 54(10): 2972-2987. 17. Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2004) High-order implicit multi-block Navier-Stokes code: Ten-year experience of application to RANS/DES/LES /DNS of turbulent flows. 7th Symposium on Overset Composite Grids & Solution Technology, Huntington Beach, CA: http://cfd.spbstu.ru/agarbaruk/c/document_library/DLFE-42505.pdf. 18. Rogers SE and Kwak D (1988) An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Time-Accurate Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations. AIAA Paper 1988-2583. 19. Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M, Spalart PR (2000) Physical and numerical upgrades in the detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. In: Friedrich R, Rodi W (eds) Advances in LES of Complex Flows, Kluwer Acad., New York. 20. Uzun A, Hussaini MY, Streett CL (2006) Large-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex on Overset Grids. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1229–1242. 21. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2010) Simulations of Vortex Formation around a Blunt Wing Tip. AIAA Journal 48(6): 1221–1234. 22. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2012) An Application of Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation to Tandem Cylinder Flow Field Prediction. Computers and Fluids 60: 71–85. 23. Vreman AW (2004) An Eddy-Viscosity Subgrid-Scale Model for Turbulent Shear Flow: Algebraic Theory and Applications. Physics of Fluids 16(10): 3670–3681. 24. Ashcroft G, Zhang X (2003) Optimized Prefactored Compact Schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 190(2): 459–457. 25. Gaitonde DV, Visbal MR (2000) Pad´e-Type Higher-Order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes Equations. AIAA Journal 38(11): 2103–2112. 26. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV (2001) Very High-Order Spatially Implicit Schemes for Computational Acoustics on Curvilinear Meshes. Journal of Computational Acoustics 9(4): 1259–1286.
�27. Sherer SE, Scott JN (2010) High-Order Compact Finite-Difference Methods on General Overset Grids. Journal of Computational Physics 210(2): 459–496. 28. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2007) Investigation of High Frequency Noise Generation in the NearNozzle Region of a Jet Using Large Eddy Simulation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 21(4): 291–321. 29. Uzun A, Hussaini MY (2009) Simulation of Noise Generation in Near-Nozzle Region of a Chevron Nozzle Jet. AIAA Journal 47(8): pp. 1793–1810. 30. Pirozzoli S, Colonius T (2013) Generalized Characteristic Relaxation Boundary Conditions for Unsteady Compressible Flow Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 248: 109–126. 31. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1992) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 1992-0439. 32. Spalart PR, Shur M (1997) On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Science and Technology l(5): 297–302. 33. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32(8): 1598-1605. 34. Abdol-Hamid KS, Carlson J-R, Rumsey CL (2015) Verification and Validation of the k-kL Turbulence Model in FUN3D and CFL3D Codes. NASA/TM-2015-218968. 35. Eisfeld B, Rumsey CL, Togiti V (2016) Verification and Validation of a Second-Moment-Closure Model. AIAA Journal 54(5): 1524--1541. 36. Speziale CG., Sarkar S, Gatski TB (1991) Modeling the Pressure-Strain Correlation of Turbulence: an Invariant Dynamical Systems Approach, J. of Fluid Mechanics 227: 245-272.
37. Launder BE, Reece GJ, and Rodi W (1975) Progress in the Development of a ReynoldsStress Turbulent Closure, J. of Fluid Mechanics 68(3): 537-566. 38. Rumsey CL (2015) Application of Reynolds Stress Models to Separated Aerodynamic Flows. In: Eisfeld B. (ed) Differential Reynolds Stress Modeling for Separating Flows in Industrial Aerodynamics, pp.19-37. 39. Spalart PR, Belyaev KV, Garbaruk AV, Shur ML, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2017) Large-Eddy and Direct Numerical Simulations of the Bachalo-Johnson Flow with Shock-Induced Separation.
Flow Turbulence and Combustion. In press.
Contributed by: E. Guseva, M. Strelets — Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU)
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024