UFR 3-34 References

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Semi-Confined Flows

Underlying Flow Regime 3-34

References

  1. Greenblatt D, Paschal KB, Yao C-S, Harris J, Schaeffler NW and Washburn AE (2006) Experimental Investigation of Separation Control Part 1: Baseline and Steady Suction. AIAA Journal 44(12): 2820-2830.
  2. Naughton JW, Viken S, Greenblatt D (2006) Skin-Friction Measurements on NASA Hump Model. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1255-1265.
  3. Langley Research Center Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control, USA, March 29-31 (2004): https://cfdval2004.larc.nasa.gov/case3expdata.html
  4. ATAAC: Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic Application Challenges. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/twiki/bin/view/ATAAC/WebHome
  5. Go4Hybrid: Grey Area Mitigation for Hybrid RANS-LES Methods. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://go4hybrid.mace.manchester.ac.uk/go4hybrid/bin/view/Main/WebHome
  6. Uzun A, Malik MR (2015) Wall-Resolves Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Separation over NASA Wall-Mounted Hump. AIAA Paper 2017-0538.
  7. NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/nasahump_val.html
  8. Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2018) 2D Wall-Mounted Hump. (2018). In: Mockett C, Haase W, Schwamborn D (eds) Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (Results of a Seventh Framework EU Project) 134: 173-187.
  9. Probst A, Schwamborn D, Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2017) Evaluation of Grey Area Mitigation Tools within Zonal and Non-Zonal RANS-LES Approaches in Flows with Pressure Induced Separation. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 68: 237–247.
  10. Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, Squires KD, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2006) New version of Detached-eddy Simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 20(3): 181–195.
  11. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2015) An Enhanced Version of DES with Rapid Transition from RANS to LES in Separated Flows. Flow Turbulence and Combustion 95: 709-737.
  12. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2008) A Hybrid RANS-LES Approach with Delayed-DES and Wall-Modelled LES Capabilities. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow (29): 1638-1649.
  13. Shur, ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2014) Synthetic Turbulence Generators for RANS-LES Interfaces in Zonal Simulations of Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Problems. Flow Turbulence and Combustion (93): 63-92.
  14. Jarrin N, Prosser R, Uribe, J, Benhamadouche S, Laurence D (2009) Reconstruction of turbulent fluctuations for hybrid RANS/LES Simulations Using a Synthetic-Eddy method. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 30: 435–442.
  15. Probst A (2016) Implementation and Assessment of the Synthetic-Eddy Method in an Unstructured Compressible Flow Solver. 6th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, Strasbourg, France, 2628 September 2016.
  16. Probst A, Löwe J, Reuß S, Knopp T, Kessler R (2016) Scale-Resolving Simulations with a LowDissipation Low-Dispersion Second-Order Scheme for Unstructured Flow Solvers. AIAA Journal 54(10): 2972-2987.
  17. Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2004) High-order implicit multi-block Navier-Stokes code: Ten-year experience of application to RANS/DES/LES /DNS of turbulent flows. 7th Symposium on Overset Composite Grids & Solution Technology, Huntington Beach, CA: http://cfd.spbstu.ru/agarbaruk/c/document_library/DLFE-42505.pdf.
  18. Rogers SE and Kwak D (1988) An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Time-Accurate Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations. AIAA Paper 1988-2583.
  19. Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M, Spalart PR (2000) Physical and numerical upgrades in the detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. In: Friedrich R, Rodi W (eds) Advances in LES of Complex Flows, Kluwer Acad., New York.
  20. Uzun A, Hussaini MY, Streett CL (2006) Large-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex on Overset Grids. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1229–1242.
  21. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2010) Simulations of Vortex Formation around a Blunt Wing Tip. AIAA Journal 48(6): 1221–1234.
  22. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2012) An Application of Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation to Tandem Cylinder Flow Field Prediction. Computers and Fluids 60: 71–85.
  23. Vreman AW (2004) An Eddy-Viscosity Subgrid-Scale Model for Turbulent Shear Flow: Algebraic Theory and Applications. Physics of Fluids 16(10): 3670–3681.
  24. Ashcroft G, Zhang X (2003) Optimized Prefactored Compact Schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 190(2): 459–457.
  25. Gaitonde DV, Visbal MR (2000) Pad´e-Type Higher-Order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes Equations. AIAA Journal 38(11): 2103–2112.
  26. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV (2001) Very High-Order Spatially Implicit Schemes for Computational Acoustics on Curvilinear Meshes. Journal of Computational Acoustics 9(4): 1259–1286.
  27. Sherer SE, Scott JN (2010) High-Order Compact Finite-Difference Methods on General Overset Grids. Journal of Computational Physics 210(2): 459–496.
  28. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2007) Investigation of High Frequency Noise Generation in the Near-Nozzle Region of a Jet Using Large Eddy Simulation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 21(4): 291–321.
  29. Uzun A, Hussaini MY (2009) Simulation of Noise Generation in Near-Nozzle Region of a Chevron Nozzle Jet. AIAA Journal 47(8): pp. 1793–1810.
  30. Pirozzoli S, Colonius T (2013) Generalized Characteristic Relaxation Boundary Conditions for Unsteady Compressible Flow Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 248: 109–126.
  31. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1992) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 1992-0439.
  32. Spalart PR, Shur M (1997) On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Science and Technology l(5): 297–302.
  33. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32(8): 1598-1605.
  34. Abdol-Hamid KS, Carlson J-R, Rumsey CL (2015) Verification and Validation of the k-kL Turbulence Model in FUN3D and CFL3D Codes. NASA/TM-2015-218968.
  35. Eisfeld B, Rumsey CL, Togiti V (2016) Verification and Validation of a Second-Moment-Closure Model. AIAA Journal 54(5): 1524--1541.
  36. Speziale CG., Sarkar S, Gatski TB (1991) Modeling the Pressure-Strain Correlation of Turbulence: an Invariant Dynamical Systems Approach, J. of Fluid Mechanics 227: 245-272.
  37. Launder BE, Reece GJ, and Rodi W (1975) Progress in the Development of a Reynolds-Stress Turbulent Closure, J. of Fluid Mechanics 68(3): 537-566.
  38. Rumsey CL (2015) Application of Reynolds Stress Models to Separated Aerodynamic Flows. In: Eisfeld B. (ed) Differential Reynolds Stress Modeling for Separating Flows in Industrial Aerodynamics, pp.19-37.
  39. Spalart PR, Belyaev KV, Garbaruk AV, Shur ML, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2017) Large-Eddy and Direct Numerical Simulations of the Bachalo-Johnson Flow with Shock-Induced Separation. Flow Turbulence and Combustion. In press.


Contributed by: E. Guseva, M. Strelets — Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU)

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2022