UFR 3-33 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Rapp.munchen (talk | contribs) |
Rapp.munchen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Unsteady results == | == Unsteady results == | ||
{{Demo_UFR_Eval}} | {{Demo_UFR_Eval}} | ||
== Comparison between numerical and experimental time-averaged results == | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 15:16, 20 January 2016
Turbulent flow past a smooth and rigid wall-mounted hemisphere
Semi-confined flows
Underlying Flow Regime 3-33
Evaluation
Unsteady results
Discuss how well the CFD calculations of the assessment quantities compare with experiment and with one another. Present some key comparisons in the form of tables or graphical plots and, where possible, provide hyperlinks to the appropriate results database. Results with different turbulence models covering as wide a range as possible should be included in the discussion. However, if too many different calculation results are available (e.g. from workshops) do not present all the comparisons here. A selection should be made showing results only for the most typical and practically important models. Comprehensive comparisons can be made available via a link to the associated databases. Finally, draw conclusions on the ability of the models used to simulate the test case flow.
Comparison between numerical and experimental time-averaged results
Contributed by: Jens Nikolas Wood, Guillaume De Nayer, Stephan Schmidt, Michael Breuer — Helmut-Schmidt Universität Hamburg
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024