Evaluation AC7-03: Difference between revisions
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Influence of the Discretization Error with URANS== | ==Influence of the Discretization Error with URANS== | ||
[[Image:Unsicherheit_Druck.png|500px|center|thumb|Fig.5.1. Pressure heads via the impeller (top). The line shows the fit <math> H_r = 109.3-3.66 \cdot 10^7 h_i^2 </math>.]] | [[Image:Unsicherheit_Druck.png|500px|center|thumb|Fig. 5.1. Pressure heads via the impeller (top). The line shows the fit <math> H_r = 109.3-3.66 \cdot 10^7 h_i^2 </math>. Pressure heads via the VAD (bottom). The line shows the fit <math> H_p=74.5-7.49\cdot10^7 h_i^2. The error bars mark the numerical uncertainties (deviations in percent).]] | ||
Figure 5.1. shows the discretization error uncertainties of the pressure headvia the VADs impeller and the whole pump. The error intervals of total pressure heads were up to 4.8% for the finest grid. From an engineering point of view, these uncertainties are in an acceptable range for the VAD design. In addition, the uncertainty for the pressure head for the whole VAD (4.8%) is higher than for the impeller alone (1.7%). The reason for this is that turbulent phenomena, e.g. detachment in the outlet guide vane, affect the pressure increase via the whole pump. Those effects may have a significant mesh sensitivity and thus affect the uncertainty of the pressure head for the entire VAD. Furthermore, the relatively small uncertainties for the pressure heads suggest that the grid resolution of UR-7 is fine enough to guarantee a grid-independent solution and no further grid refinement seems to be required for these results. | Figure 5.1. shows the discretization error uncertainties of the pressure headvia the VADs impeller and the whole pump. The error intervals of total pressure heads were up to 4.8% for the finest grid. From an engineering point of view, these uncertainties are in an acceptable range for the VAD design. In addition, the uncertainty for the pressure head for the whole VAD (4.8%) is higher than for the impeller alone (1.7%). The reason for this is that turbulent phenomena, e.g. detachment in the outlet guide vane, affect the pressure increase via the whole pump. Those effects may have a significant mesh sensitivity and thus affect the uncertainty of the pressure head for the entire VAD. Furthermore, the relatively small uncertainties for the pressure heads suggest that the grid resolution of UR-7 is fine enough to guarantee a grid-independent solution and no further grid refinement seems to be required for these results. |
Revision as of 14:09, 8 November 2021
Turbulent Blood Flow in a Ventricular Assist Device
Application Challenge AC7-03 © copyright ERCOFTAC 2021
Evaluation
Influence of the Discretization Error with URANS
Figure 5.1. shows the discretization error uncertainties of the pressure headvia the VADs impeller and the whole pump. The error intervals of total pressure heads were up to 4.8% for the finest grid. From an engineering point of view, these uncertainties are in an acceptable range for the VAD design. In addition, the uncertainty for the pressure head for the whole VAD (4.8%) is higher than for the impeller alone (1.7%). The reason for this is that turbulent phenomena, e.g. detachment in the outlet guide vane, affect the pressure increase via the whole pump. Those effects may have a significant mesh sensitivity and thus affect the uncertainty of the pressure head for the entire VAD. Furthermore, the relatively small uncertainties for the pressure heads suggest that the grid resolution of UR-7 is fine enough to guarantee a grid-independent solution and no further grid refinement seems to be required for these results.
Experimental Validation of URANS and LES
Comparison of Different URANS methods
Contributed by: B. Torner — University of Rostock, Germany
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2021