Abstr:Flow around (airfoils and) blades (transonic): Difference between revisions
David.Fowler (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
David.Fowler (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Transonic flows are becoming the most typical flows of modern turbomachinery, in power generation (turbines of large output - tip sections of last stages, first stages in the high pressure side), in air-breathing engines (transonic fans, inlet guide vanes and diffusers of radial flow compressors), or in refrigeration technology (expansion turbines, compressors). From the aerodynamics point of view, there are several phenomena typical of transonic cascades, like | Transonic flows are becoming the most typical flows of modern turbomachinery, in power generation (turbines of large output - tip sections of last stages, first stages in the high pressure side), in air-breathing engines (transonic fans, inlet guide vanes and diffusers of radial flow compressors), or in refrigeration technology (expansion turbines, compressors). From the aerodynamics point of view, there are several phenomena typical of transonic cascades, like | ||
*aerodynamic choking and the existence of a critical cross section (the narrowest effective cross section); | * aerodynamic choking and the existence of a critical cross section (the narrowest effective cross section); | ||
*secondary flows due to the channel curvature and area constriction, as well as due to corner boundary layers, and are the most important reason for the three-dimensional character of internal transonic flows; | * secondary flows due to the channel curvature and area constriction, as well as due to corner boundary layers, and are the most important reason for the three-dimensional character of internal transonic flows; | ||
*strong viscous/inviscid interaction with very specific aspects of flow separation, and transition from supersonic to subsonic velocities (pseudoshock waves); | * strong viscous/inviscid interaction with very specific aspects of flow separation, and transition from supersonic to subsonic velocities (pseudoshock waves); | ||
*upstream effect of downstream conditions on the development of transonic phenomena is very important. Due to strong viscosity effects, there always exists a non-negligible subsonic region near the walls, representing a way for upstream propagation of the downstream flow conditions. It is a fertile field for transonic instability and for various unsteady phenomena. | * upstream effect of downstream conditions on the development of transonic phenomena is very important. Due to strong viscosity effects, there always exists a non-negligible subsonic region near the walls, representing a way for upstream propagation of the downstream flow conditions. It is a fertile field for transonic instability and for various unsteady phenomena. | ||
Because of the complexity of transonic flow in the three-dimensional cascades, the attention is concentrated to the two-dimensional transonic flow through the blade cascade. The 2D analysis of blade cascades is still interesting both from experimental and from numerical point of view. The interest is motivated by the need for profiles with increasing load and high efficiency. | Because of the complexity of transonic flow in the three-dimensional cascades, the attention is concentrated to the two-dimensional transonic flow through the blade cascade. The 2D analysis of blade cascades is still interesting both from experimental and from numerical point of view. The interest is motivated by the need for profiles with increasing load and high efficiency. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
As the underlying flow regime was chosen the two-dimensional transonic flow through the turbine rotor blade cascade where the most important phenomena that should be adequately modelled are as follows: | As the underlying flow regime was chosen the two-dimensional transonic flow through the turbine rotor blade cascade where the most important phenomena that should be adequately modelled are as follows: | ||
*stagnation point flow; | * stagnation point flow; | ||
*laminar/turbulent transition; | * laminar/turbulent transition; | ||
*shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction with possible flow separation. | * shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction with possible flow separation. | ||
The shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction seems to be the most important phenomenon and its adequate capture in numerical simulations is crucial for the description of the flow field and for the determination of energy losses. | The shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction seems to be the most important phenomenon and its adequate capture in numerical simulations is crucial for the description of the flow field and for the determination of energy losses. | ||
Beside the UFR considered here, further Underlying Flow Regimes are important for the selected case of transonic flow in blade cascades, especially laminar-turbulent boundary-layer transition (UFR3-04), shock/boundary-layer interaction (UFR3-05), 2D boundary layers with pressure gradients (UFR3-03) and stagnation point flow (UFR3-12). | Beside the UFR considered here, further Underlying Flow Regimes are important for the selected case of transonic flow in blade cascades, especially laminar-turbulent boundary-layer transition (UFR3-04), shock/boundary-layer interaction (UFR3-05), 2D boundary layers with pressure gradients (UFR3-03) and stagnation point flow (UFR3-12). | ||
---- | ---- | ||
''Contributors: Jaromir Prihoda; Karel Kozel - Czech Academy of Sciences'' | ''Contributors: Jaromir Prihoda; Karel Kozel - Czech Academy of Sciences'' | ||
Revision as of 10:31, 11 March 2009
Flows Around Bodies
Underlying Flow Regime 2-06
Abstract
The transonic flow through blade cascades is crucial problem for many turbomachinery applications. Blade cascades represent the basic element for the energy transformation in turbines and compressors as well. The demand for increasing of performance, efficiency and reliability of all types of turbomachines leads to the demand for further improvement of the design methods, especially methods based on CFD codes.
Turbomachinery internal flows belong to the most complex ones in practical applications of fluid dynamics. It follows from complicated geometry of flow passages, three-dimensional flow character with substantial effects of secondary flows, effects of laminar-turbulent transition, heat transfer, rotation, shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction and effect of further parameters. Due to this complexity, there is a noticable need for careful validation of CFD codes used and for their continuous improvement.
During last twenty years due to the progress of computational techniques, the use of CFD for turbomachinery applications is continuously increasing. A lot of commercial and in-house software codes have been produced during these years. There are many papers (publications) dealing with numerical simulations of flow though blade cascades starting with inviscid models up to sophisticated models of viscous turbulent flows, see e.g. Novak et al. (1992), Chen and Leschziner (1999). Reviews of CFD methods for turbomachinery flows and their validations were given by Hirsch (1994), Couaillier (1995), and by Casey and Wintergerste (2000).
The commercial packages enable on one hand solving of complex three-dimensional viscous flows in boundary conditions typical for turbomachinery internal flows but on the other hand they are too general and do not allow to solve some specific phenomena as laminar/turbulent transition and/or non-reflecting boundary conditions at the exit of the cascade.
Therefore, there is still need for suitable relevant test cases allowing verification and validation of the numerical codes from the viewpoint of their reliability. The transonic flow through blade cascade represents such a flow regime involving the most important features of transonic flow in turbomachinery, especially shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction with possible separation and laminar-turbulent transition.
Transonic flows are becoming the most typical flows of modern turbomachinery, in power generation (turbines of large output - tip sections of last stages, first stages in the high pressure side), in air-breathing engines (transonic fans, inlet guide vanes and diffusers of radial flow compressors), or in refrigeration technology (expansion turbines, compressors). From the aerodynamics point of view, there are several phenomena typical of transonic cascades, like
- aerodynamic choking and the existence of a critical cross section (the narrowest effective cross section);
- secondary flows due to the channel curvature and area constriction, as well as due to corner boundary layers, and are the most important reason for the three-dimensional character of internal transonic flows;
- strong viscous/inviscid interaction with very specific aspects of flow separation, and transition from supersonic to subsonic velocities (pseudoshock waves);
- upstream effect of downstream conditions on the development of transonic phenomena is very important. Due to strong viscosity effects, there always exists a non-negligible subsonic region near the walls, representing a way for upstream propagation of the downstream flow conditions. It is a fertile field for transonic instability and for various unsteady phenomena.
Because of the complexity of transonic flow in the three-dimensional cascades, the attention is concentrated to the two-dimensional transonic flow through the blade cascade. The 2D analysis of blade cascades is still interesting both from experimental and from numerical point of view. The interest is motivated by the need for profiles with increasing load and high efficiency.
As the underlying flow regime was chosen the two-dimensional transonic flow through the turbine rotor blade cascade where the most important phenomena that should be adequately modelled are as follows:
- stagnation point flow;
- laminar/turbulent transition;
- shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction with possible flow separation.
The shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction seems to be the most important phenomenon and its adequate capture in numerical simulations is crucial for the description of the flow field and for the determination of energy losses.
Beside the UFR considered here, further Underlying Flow Regimes are important for the selected case of transonic flow in blade cascades, especially laminar-turbulent boundary-layer transition (UFR3-04), shock/boundary-layer interaction (UFR3-05), 2D boundary layers with pressure gradients (UFR3-03) and stagnation point flow (UFR3-12).
Contributors: Jaromir Prihoda; Karel Kozel - Czech Academy of Sciences