UFR 3-34 References: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Dave.Ellacott moved page Lib:UFR 3-34 References to UFR 3-34 References over redirect)
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
}}
}}
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
== Semi-Confined Flows ==
=== Underlying Flow Regime 3-34 ===
= References =
= References =
1. Greenblatt D, Paschal KB, Yao C-S, Harris J, Schaeffler NW and Washburn AE (2006)
# <div id="1">'''Greenblatt D, Paschal KB, Yao C-S, Harris J, Schaeffler NW and Washburn AE''' (2006) Experimental Investigation of Separation Control Part 1: Baseline and Steady Suction. AIAA Journal 44(12): 2820-2830.</div>
Experimental Investigation of Separation Control Part 1: Baseline and Steady Suction. AIAA Journal
# <div id="2">'''Naughton JW, Viken S, Greenblatt D''' (2006) Skin-Friction Measurements on NASA Hump Model. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1255-1265.</div>
44(12): 2820-2830.
# <div id="3">Langley Research Center Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control, USA, March 29-31 (2004): https://cfdval2004.larc.nasa.gov/case3expdata.html</div>
2. Naughton JW, Viken S, Greenblatt D (2006) Skin-Friction Measurements on NASA Hump Model.
# <div id="4">ATAAC: Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic Application Challenges. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/twiki/bin/view/ATAAC/WebHome</div>
AIAA Journal 44(6): 1255-1265.
# <div id="5">Go4Hybrid: Grey Area Mitigation for Hybrid RANS-LES Methods. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://go4hybrid.mace.manchester.ac.uk/go4hybrid/bin/view/Main/WebHome</div>
3. Langley Research Center Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation
# <div id="6">'''Uzun A, Malik MR''' (2015) Wall-Resolves Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Separation over NASA Wall-Mounted Hump. AIAA Paper 2017-0538.</div>
Control, USA, March 29-31 (2004): https://cfdval2004.larc.nasa.gov/case3expdata.html
# <div id="7">NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/nasahump_val.html</div>
4. ATAAC: Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic Application Challenges. A Seventh
# <div id="8">'''Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A''' (2018) 2D Wall-Mounted Hump. (2018). In: '''Mockett C, Haase W, Schwamborn D (eds)''' Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (Results of a Seventh Framework EU Project) 134: 173-187.</div>
Framework EU Project: http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/twiki/bin/view/ATAAC/WebHome
# <div id="9">'''Probst A, Schwamborn D, Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A''' (2017) Evaluation of Grey Area Mitigation Tools within Zonal and Non-Zonal RANS-LES Approaches in Flows with Pressure Induced Separation. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 68: 237–247.</div>
 
# <div id="10">'''Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, Squires KD, Strelets MKh, Travin AK''' (2006) New version of Detached-eddy Simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 20(3): 181–195.</div>
�5. Go4Hybrid: Grey Area Mitigation for Hybrid RANS-LES Methods. A Seventh Framework EU
# <div id="11">'''Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK''' (2015) An Enhanced Version of DES with Rapid Transition from RANS to LES in Separated Flows. Flow Turbulence and Combustion 95: 709-737.</div>
Project: http://go4hybrid.mace.manchester.ac.uk/go4hybrid/bin/view/Main/WebHome
# <div id="12">'''Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK''' (2008) A Hybrid RANS-LES Approach with Delayed-DES and Wall-Modelled LES Capabilities. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow (29): 1638-1649.</div>
6. Uzun A, Malik MR (2015) Wall-Resolves Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Separation over NASA
# <div id="13">'''Shur, ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK''' (2014) Synthetic Turbulence Generators for RANS-LES Interfaces in Zonal Simulations of Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Problems. Flow Turbulence and Combustion (93): 63-92.</div>
Wall-Mounted Hump. AIAA Paper 2017-0538.
# <div id="14">'''Jarrin N, Prosser R, Uribe, J, Benhamadouche S, Laurence D''' (2009) Reconstruction of turbulent fluctuations for hybrid RANS/LES Simulations Using a Synthetic-Eddy method. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 30: 435–442.</div>
7. NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/nasahump_val.html
# <div id="15">'''Probst A''' (2016) Implementation and Assessment of the Synthetic-Eddy Method in an Unstructured Compressible Flow Solver. 6th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, Strasbourg, France, 2628 September 2016.</div>
8. Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2018) 2D Wall-Mounted Hump. (2018).
# <div id="16">'''Probst A, Löwe J, Reuß S, Knopp T, Kessler R''' (2016) Scale-Resolving Simulations with a LowDissipation Low-Dispersion Second-Order Scheme for Unstructured Flow Solvers. AIAA Journal 54(10): 2972-2987.</div>
In: Mockett C, Haase W, Schwamborn D (eds) Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and
# <div id="17">'''Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A''' (2004) High-order implicit multi-block Navier-Stokes code: Ten-year experience of application to RANS/DES/LES /DNS of turbulent flows. 7th Symposium on Overset Composite Grids & Solution Technology, Huntington Beach, CA: http://cfd.spbstu.ru/agarbaruk/c/document_library/DLFE-42505.pdf.</div>
Multidisciplinary Design (Results of a Seventh Framework EU Project) 134: 173-187.
# <div id="18">'''Rogers SE and Kwak D''' (1988) An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Time-Accurate Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations. AIAA Paper 1988-2583.</div>
9. Probst A, Schwamborn D, Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2017)
# <div id="19">'''Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M, Spalart PR''' (2000) Physical and numerical upgrades in the detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. In: '''Friedrich R, Rodi W (eds)''' Advances in LES of Complex Flows, Kluwer Acad., New York.</div>
Evaluation of Grey Area Mitigation Tools within Zonal and Non-Zonal RANS-LES Approaches in
# <div id="20">'''Uzun A, Hussaini MY, Streett CL''' (2006) Large-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex on Overset Grids. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1229–1242.</div>
Flows with Pressure Induced Separation. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow. In press.
# <div id="21">'''Uzun, A, Hussaini MY''' (2010) Simulations of Vortex Formation around a Blunt Wing Tip. AIAA Journal 48(6): 1221–1234.</div>
10. Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, Squires KD, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2006) New version of
# <div id="22">'''Uzun, A, Hussaini MY''' (2012) An Application of Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation to Tandem Cylinder Flow Field Prediction. Computers and Fluids 60: 71–85.</div>
Detached-eddy Simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational
# <div id="23">'''Vreman AW''' (2004) An Eddy-Viscosity Subgrid-Scale Model for Turbulent Shear Flow: Algebraic Theory and Applications. Physics of Fluids 16(10): 3670–3681.</div>
Fluid Dynamics 20(3): 181–195.
# <div id="24">'''Ashcroft G, Zhang X''' (2003) Optimized Prefactored Compact Schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 190(2): 459–457.</div>
11. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2015) An Enhanced Version of DES with Rapid
# <div id="25">'''Gaitonde DV, Visbal MR''' (2000) Pad´e-Type Higher-Order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes Equations. AIAA Journal 38(11): 2103–2112.</div>
Transition from RANS to LES in Separated Flows. Flow Turbulence and Combustion 95: 709-737.
# <div id="26">'''Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV''' (2001) Very High-Order Spatially Implicit Schemes for Computational Acoustics on Curvilinear Meshes. Journal of Computational Acoustics 9(4): 1259–1286.</div>
12. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2008) A Hybrid RANS-LES Approach with
# <div id="27">'''Sherer SE, Scott JN''' (2010) High-Order Compact Finite-Difference Methods on General Overset Grids. Journal of Computational Physics 210(2): 459–496.</div>
Delayed-DES and Wall-Modelled LES Capabilities. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow (29): 1638-1649.
# <div id="28">'''Uzun, A, Hussaini MY''' (2007) Investigation of High Frequency Noise Generation in the Near-Nozzle Region of a Jet Using Large Eddy Simulation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 21(4): 291–321.</div>
13. Shur, ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2014) Synthetic Turbulence Generators for
# <div id="29">'''Uzun A, Hussaini MY''' (2009) Simulation of Noise Generation in Near-Nozzle Region of a Chevron Nozzle Jet. AIAA Journal 47(8): pp. 1793–1810.</div>
RANS-LES Interfaces in Zonal Simulations of Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Problems. Flow
# <div id="30">'''Pirozzoli S, Colonius T''' (2013) Generalized Characteristic Relaxation Boundary Conditions for Unsteady Compressible Flow Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 248: 109–126.</div>
Turbulence and Combustion (93): 63-92.
# <div id="31">'''Spalart PR, Allmaras SR''' (1992) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 1992-0439.</div>
14. Jarrin N, Prosser R, Uribe, J, Benhamadouche S, Laurence D (2009) Reconstruction of turbulent
# <div id="32">'''Spalart PR, Shur M''' (1997) On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Science and Technology l(5): 297–302.</div>
fluctuations for hybrid RANS/LES Simulations Using a Synthetic-Eddy method. Int. J. Heat and
# <div id="33">'''Menter FR''' (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32(8): 1598-1605.</div>
Fluid Flow 30: 435–442.
# <div id="34">'''Abdol-Hamid KS, Carlson J-R, Rumsey CL''' (2015) Verification and Validation of the k-kL Turbulence Model in FUN3D and CFL3D Codes. NASA/TM-2015-218968.</div>
15. Probst A (2016) Implementation and Assessment of the Synthetic-Eddy Method in an Unstructured
# <div id="35">'''Eisfeld B, Rumsey CL, Togiti V''' (2016) Verification and Validation of a Second-Moment-Closure Model. AIAA Journal 54(5): 1524--1541.</div>
Compressible Flow Solver. 6th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, Strasbourg, France, 2628 September 2016.
# <div id="36">'''Speziale CG., Sarkar S, Gatski TB''' (1991) Modeling the Pressure-Strain Correlation of Turbulence: an Invariant Dynamical Systems Approach, J. of Fluid Mechanics 227: 245-272.</div>
16. Probst A, Löwe J, Reuß S, Knopp T, Kessler R (2016) Scale-Resolving Simulations with a LowDissipation Low-Dispersion Second-Order Scheme for Unstructured Flow Solvers. AIAA Journal
# <div id="37">'''Launder BE, Reece GJ, and Rodi W''' (1975) Progress in the Development of a Reynolds-Stress Turbulent Closure, J. of Fluid Mechanics 68(3): 537-566.</div>
54(10): 2972-2987.
# <div id="38">'''Rumsey CL''' (2015) Application of Reynolds Stress Models to Separated Aerodynamic Flows. In: '''Eisfeld B. (ed)''' Differential Reynolds Stress Modeling for Separating Flows in Industrial Aerodynamics, pp.19-37.</div>
17. Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2004) High-order implicit multi-block Navier-Stokes code:
# <div id="39">'''Spalart PR, Belyaev KV, Garbaruk AV, Shur ML, Strelets MKh, Travin AK''' (2017) Large-Eddy and Direct Numerical Simulations of the Bachalo-Johnson Flow with Shock-Induced Separation. Flow Turbulence and Combustion. In press.</div>
Ten-year experience of application to RANS/DES/LES /DNS of turbulent flows. 7th Symposium on
Overset
Composite
Grids
&
Solution
Technology,
Huntington
Beach,
CA:
http://cfd.spbstu.ru/agarbaruk/c/document_library/DLFE-42505.pdf.
18. Rogers SE and Kwak D (1988) An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Time-Accurate
Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations. AIAA Paper 1988-2583.
19. Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M, Spalart PR (2000) Physical and numerical upgrades in the
detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. In: Friedrich R, Rodi W (eds) Advances in
LES of Complex Flows, Kluwer Acad., New York.
20. Uzun A, Hussaini MY, Streett CL (2006) Large-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex on Overset
Grids. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1229–1242.
21. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2010) Simulations of Vortex Formation around a Blunt Wing Tip. AIAA
Journal 48(6): 1221–1234.
22. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2012) An Application of Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation to Tandem
Cylinder Flow Field Prediction. Computers and Fluids 60: 71–85.
23. Vreman AW (2004) An Eddy-Viscosity Subgrid-Scale Model for Turbulent Shear Flow: Algebraic
Theory and Applications. Physics of Fluids 16(10): 3670–3681.
24. Ashcroft G, Zhang X (2003) Optimized Prefactored Compact Schemes. Journal of Computational
Physics 190(2): 459–457.
25. Gaitonde DV, Visbal MR (2000) Pad´e-Type Higher-Order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes
Equations. AIAA Journal 38(11): 2103–2112.
26. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV (2001) Very High-Order Spatially Implicit Schemes for Computational
Acoustics on Curvilinear Meshes. Journal of Computational Acoustics 9(4): 1259–1286.
 
�27. Sherer SE, Scott JN (2010) High-Order Compact Finite-Difference Methods on General Overset
Grids. Journal of Computational Physics 210(2): 459–496.
28. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2007) Investigation of High Frequency Noise Generation in the NearNozzle Region of a Jet Using Large Eddy Simulation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid
Dynamics 21(4): 291–321.
29. Uzun A, Hussaini MY (2009) Simulation of Noise Generation in Near-Nozzle Region of a Chevron
Nozzle Jet. AIAA Journal 47(8): pp. 1793–1810.
30. Pirozzoli S, Colonius T (2013) Generalized Characteristic Relaxation Boundary Conditions for
Unsteady Compressible Flow Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 248: 109–126.
31. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1992) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA
Paper 1992-0439.
32. Spalart PR, Shur M (1997) On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature.
Aerospace Science and Technology l(5): 297–302.
33. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.
AIAA Journal 32(8): 1598-1605.
34. Abdol-Hamid KS, Carlson J-R, Rumsey CL (2015) Verification and Validation of the
k-kL Turbulence Model in FUN3D and CFL3D Codes. NASA/TM-2015-218968.
35. Eisfeld B, Rumsey CL, Togiti V (2016) Verification and Validation of a Second-Moment-Closure
Model. AIAA Journal 54(5): 1524--1541.
36. Speziale CG., Sarkar S, Gatski TB (1991) Modeling the Pressure-Strain Correlation of Turbulence:
an Invariant Dynamical Systems Approach, J. of Fluid Mechanics 227: 245-272.
 
37. Launder BE, Reece GJ, and Rodi W (1975) Progress in the Development of a ReynoldsStress Turbulent Closure, J. of Fluid Mechanics 68(3): 537-566.
38. Rumsey CL (2015) Application of Reynolds Stress Models to Separated Aerodynamic
Flows. In: Eisfeld B. (ed) Differential Reynolds Stress Modeling for Separating Flows in
Industrial Aerodynamics, pp.19-37.
39. Spalart PR, Belyaev KV, Garbaruk AV, Shur ML, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2017) Large-Eddy
and Direct Numerical Simulations of the Bachalo-Johnson Flow with Shock-Induced Separation.
 
Flow Turbulence and Combustion. In press.
 
<br/>
----
----
{{ACContribs
{{ACContribs

Latest revision as of 11:10, 15 March 2018

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Semi-Confined Flows

Underlying Flow Regime 3-34

References

  1. Greenblatt D, Paschal KB, Yao C-S, Harris J, Schaeffler NW and Washburn AE (2006) Experimental Investigation of Separation Control Part 1: Baseline and Steady Suction. AIAA Journal 44(12): 2820-2830.
  2. Naughton JW, Viken S, Greenblatt D (2006) Skin-Friction Measurements on NASA Hump Model. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1255-1265.
  3. Langley Research Center Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control, USA, March 29-31 (2004): https://cfdval2004.larc.nasa.gov/case3expdata.html
  4. ATAAC: Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic Application Challenges. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/twiki/bin/view/ATAAC/WebHome
  5. Go4Hybrid: Grey Area Mitigation for Hybrid RANS-LES Methods. A Seventh Framework EU Project: http://go4hybrid.mace.manchester.ac.uk/go4hybrid/bin/view/Main/WebHome
  6. Uzun A, Malik MR (2015) Wall-Resolves Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Separation over NASA Wall-Mounted Hump. AIAA Paper 2017-0538.
  7. NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/nasahump_val.html
  8. Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2018) 2D Wall-Mounted Hump. (2018). In: Mockett C, Haase W, Schwamborn D (eds) Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (Results of a Seventh Framework EU Project) 134: 173-187.
  9. Probst A, Schwamborn D, Garbaruk A, Guseva E, Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2017) Evaluation of Grey Area Mitigation Tools within Zonal and Non-Zonal RANS-LES Approaches in Flows with Pressure Induced Separation. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 68: 237–247.
  10. Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, Squires KD, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2006) New version of Detached-eddy Simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 20(3): 181–195.
  11. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2015) An Enhanced Version of DES with Rapid Transition from RANS to LES in Separated Flows. Flow Turbulence and Combustion 95: 709-737.
  12. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2008) A Hybrid RANS-LES Approach with Delayed-DES and Wall-Modelled LES Capabilities. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow (29): 1638-1649.
  13. Shur, ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2014) Synthetic Turbulence Generators for RANS-LES Interfaces in Zonal Simulations of Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Problems. Flow Turbulence and Combustion (93): 63-92.
  14. Jarrin N, Prosser R, Uribe, J, Benhamadouche S, Laurence D (2009) Reconstruction of turbulent fluctuations for hybrid RANS/LES Simulations Using a Synthetic-Eddy method. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 30: 435–442.
  15. Probst A (2016) Implementation and Assessment of the Synthetic-Eddy Method in an Unstructured Compressible Flow Solver. 6th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, Strasbourg, France, 2628 September 2016.
  16. Probst A, Löwe J, Reuß S, Knopp T, Kessler R (2016) Scale-Resolving Simulations with a LowDissipation Low-Dispersion Second-Order Scheme for Unstructured Flow Solvers. AIAA Journal 54(10): 2972-2987.
  17. Shur M, Strelets M, Travin A (2004) High-order implicit multi-block Navier-Stokes code: Ten-year experience of application to RANS/DES/LES /DNS of turbulent flows. 7th Symposium on Overset Composite Grids & Solution Technology, Huntington Beach, CA: http://cfd.spbstu.ru/agarbaruk/c/document_library/DLFE-42505.pdf.
  18. Rogers SE and Kwak D (1988) An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Time-Accurate Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations. AIAA Paper 1988-2583.
  19. Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M, Spalart PR (2000) Physical and numerical upgrades in the detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. In: Friedrich R, Rodi W (eds) Advances in LES of Complex Flows, Kluwer Acad., New York.
  20. Uzun A, Hussaini MY, Streett CL (2006) Large-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex on Overset Grids. AIAA Journal 44(6): 1229–1242.
  21. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2010) Simulations of Vortex Formation around a Blunt Wing Tip. AIAA Journal 48(6): 1221–1234.
  22. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2012) An Application of Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation to Tandem Cylinder Flow Field Prediction. Computers and Fluids 60: 71–85.
  23. Vreman AW (2004) An Eddy-Viscosity Subgrid-Scale Model for Turbulent Shear Flow: Algebraic Theory and Applications. Physics of Fluids 16(10): 3670–3681.
  24. Ashcroft G, Zhang X (2003) Optimized Prefactored Compact Schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 190(2): 459–457.
  25. Gaitonde DV, Visbal MR (2000) Pad´e-Type Higher-Order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes Equations. AIAA Journal 38(11): 2103–2112.
  26. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV (2001) Very High-Order Spatially Implicit Schemes for Computational Acoustics on Curvilinear Meshes. Journal of Computational Acoustics 9(4): 1259–1286.
  27. Sherer SE, Scott JN (2010) High-Order Compact Finite-Difference Methods on General Overset Grids. Journal of Computational Physics 210(2): 459–496.
  28. Uzun, A, Hussaini MY (2007) Investigation of High Frequency Noise Generation in the Near-Nozzle Region of a Jet Using Large Eddy Simulation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 21(4): 291–321.
  29. Uzun A, Hussaini MY (2009) Simulation of Noise Generation in Near-Nozzle Region of a Chevron Nozzle Jet. AIAA Journal 47(8): pp. 1793–1810.
  30. Pirozzoli S, Colonius T (2013) Generalized Characteristic Relaxation Boundary Conditions for Unsteady Compressible Flow Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 248: 109–126.
  31. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1992) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 1992-0439.
  32. Spalart PR, Shur M (1997) On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Science and Technology l(5): 297–302.
  33. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32(8): 1598-1605.
  34. Abdol-Hamid KS, Carlson J-R, Rumsey CL (2015) Verification and Validation of the k-kL Turbulence Model in FUN3D and CFL3D Codes. NASA/TM-2015-218968.
  35. Eisfeld B, Rumsey CL, Togiti V (2016) Verification and Validation of a Second-Moment-Closure Model. AIAA Journal 54(5): 1524--1541.
  36. Speziale CG., Sarkar S, Gatski TB (1991) Modeling the Pressure-Strain Correlation of Turbulence: an Invariant Dynamical Systems Approach, J. of Fluid Mechanics 227: 245-272.
  37. Launder BE, Reece GJ, and Rodi W (1975) Progress in the Development of a Reynolds-Stress Turbulent Closure, J. of Fluid Mechanics 68(3): 537-566.
  38. Rumsey CL (2015) Application of Reynolds Stress Models to Separated Aerodynamic Flows. In: Eisfeld B. (ed) Differential Reynolds Stress Modeling for Separating Flows in Industrial Aerodynamics, pp.19-37.
  39. Spalart PR, Belyaev KV, Garbaruk AV, Shur ML, Strelets MKh, Travin AK (2017) Large-Eddy and Direct Numerical Simulations of the Bachalo-Johnson Flow with Shock-Induced Separation. Flow Turbulence and Combustion. In press.


Contributed by: E. Guseva, M. Strelets — Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU)

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024

Retrieved from "http://kbwiki.ercoftac.org/w/index.php?title=UFR_3-34_References&oldid=34880"