UFR 1-06 Best Practice Advice: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
=== Numerical Modelling Issues === | === Numerical Modelling Issues === | ||
<ul> | |||
<li>The flow can be treated as axisymmetric.</li> | |||
<li>For a grid-independent resolution of the George ''et al.'' | |||
plume, at least (40 × 100) grid nodes | |||
should be used in the (radial × axial) directions. At least | |||
10 nodes should be used radially to resolve the plume source.</li> | |||
<li>Discretization schemes should be at least second-order accurate.</li> | |||
<li>For further advice on boundary conditions, see Section 3.4.3.</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
=== Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions === | === Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions === | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 30 March 2010
Axisymmetric buoyant far-field plume in a quiescent unstratified environment
Underlying Flow Regime 1-06
Best Practice Advice
Best Practice Advice for the UFR
Key Physics
The key physics to be captured in this UFR is the self-similar behaviour of a spreading axisymmetric buoyant plume.
Numerical Modelling Issues
- The flow can be treated as axisymmetric.
- For a grid-independent resolution of the George et al. plume, at least (40 × 100) grid nodes should be used in the (radial × axial) directions. At least 10 nodes should be used radially to resolve the plume source.
- Discretization schemes should be at least second-order accurate.
- For further advice on boundary conditions, see Section 3.4.3.
Computational Domain and Boundary Conditions
Physical Modelling
Application Uncertainties
Recommendations for further work
Contributed by: Simon Gant — Lea Associates
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2010