Test Data AC6-14: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 47: Line 47:
The numerical simulations without and with the blade tip gap further support this
The numerical simulations without and with the blade tip gap further support this
conclusion.
conclusion.


All experimental data are gathered in single phase (non-cavitating) conditions by keeping
All experimental data are gathered in single phase (non-cavitating) conditions by keeping
Line 64: Line 63:
For each experimental point there are between 20000 and 50000 particles crossing the
For each experimental point there are between 20000 and 50000 particles crossing the
measuring volume, during the acquisition time of 30 seconds.
measuring volume, during the acquisition time of 30 seconds.


<div id="figure3"></div>
<div id="figure3"></div>
Line 75: Line 70:
|align="center"|'''Figure3:''' Photo of the Timi&#351;oara swirl generator
|align="center"|'''Figure3:''' Photo of the Timi&#351;oara swirl generator
|}
|}
==TEST CASE EXP1==
==TEST CASE EXP1==
===Description of Experiment===
===Description of Experiment===

Revision as of 09:01, 11 April 2016

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Swirling flow in a conical diffuser generated with rotor-stator interaction

Application Challenge AC6-14   © copyright ERCOFTAC 2024

Overview of Tests

A closed loop experimental test rig was developed and measuresd at the Politehnica University of Timi\c soara, Romania, ~\cite{Resiga2007} for investigating decelerated swirling flows in a conical diffuser and for assessing various flow control methods. The test rig includes the following (see Fig. \ref{circuit}): (i) a main hydraulic circuit, marked blue; (ii) an auxiliary hydraulic circuit, marked red that is implemented in order to assess different control methods ~\cite{Tanasa2013,Bosioc2012}; (iii) a lower reservoir with a volume of 4$\textrm{m}^3$; (iv) a main pump that is able to provide a maximum flow rate of 40 l/s; (v) an upper reservoir equipped with a honeycomb section to provide an uniform flow at the inlet of the swirl test section, and (vi) a test section, marked magenta.

AC6-14 TimisoaraTestRig.jpg|AC6-14 TimisoaraTestRigSchetch.jpg
Figure 2: Photo and schematic view of experimental closed loop test rig from UPT

The test section contains two main parts: i) the swirl generator with 13 fixed guide vanes and a runner with 10 blades, see Fig.~\ref{Swirl_Generator}, and ii) the convergent-divergent test section \cite{Bosioc2008}. The divergent part of the test section, with total angle of $17\,^{\circ}$ ($2\times8.5^{\circ}$) is designed to generate a flow similar to that in a Francis turbine draft tube. The hub and shroud diameters of the swirl generator are $D_{hub}$=0.09m and $D_{shroud}$=0.15m, respectively. The guide vanes create a tangential velocity component, yielding a pressure increase from the hub to shroud at all operating conditions. The purpose of the runner is to redistribute the total pressure by inducing an excess in the axial velocity near the shroud and a corresponding deficit near the hub, like a Francis turbine operating at partial discharge. The runner thus acts as a turbine near the hub and as a pump near the shroud. There is a gap between the blade tip and the shroud of about 0.4mm. Although the effect of tip-clearance is not investigated, the velocity profiles measured further downstream did not reveal significant leakage flows effects. The numerical simulations without and with the blade tip gap further support this conclusion.

All experimental data are gathered in single phase (non-cavitating) conditions by keeping the test rig pressurized at a large enough pressure level, since a cavitating vortex rope brings additional complexity to the flow phenomenon and the experimental methodology. The experimental velocity is obtained with a Dantec Dynamics two-component LDA. The LDA system consists of an argon-ion laser of 300mW power, and an optical probe with focal length 159.6mm, beam diameter 2.2mm and beam spacing 39.2mm. A three-dimensional traversing system is used for the probe positioning, with a 0.01mm accuracy on each axis. The measurements are performed along each survey axis with a step size of 1mm. Silver coated hollow glass particles are added into the water for efficient light back-scattering. The average particle diameter is 10$\mu$m, and the relative density is $\rho_{particles} / \rho_{water}$ = 1.402. For each experimental point there are between 20000 and 50000 particles crossing the measuring volume, during the acquisition time of 30 seconds.

AC6-14 TimisoaraSwirlGenerator.jpg
Figure3: Photo of the Timişoara swirl generator

TEST CASE EXP1

Description of Experiment

Boundary Data

Measurement Errors

Measured Data

References

TEST CASE EXP2

(as per EXP 1)



Contributed by: A. Javadi, A. Bosioc, H Nilsson, S. Muntean, R. Susan-Resiga — Chalmers University of Technology

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024