Quality Review Documents: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{|border="0" cellpadding="5"
{|border="0" cellpadding="5"
|   
|   
|Application Challenge ('''AC''') Quality Review template:
|'''AC''' Quality Review template:
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.doc|Word format]]
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.doc|Word format]]
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.pdf|PDF format]]
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.pdf|PDF format]]
|-
|-
|   
|   
|Underlying Flow Regime ('''UFR''') Quality Review template:
|'''UFR''' Quality Review template:
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.doc|Word format]]
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.doc|Word format]]
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.pdf|PDF format]]
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.pdf|PDF format]]
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 08:59, 27 June 2012

All Application Challenge (AC) and Underlying Flow Regime (UFR) articles within the Knowledge Base have been quality checked with the aid of the following templates. Any new or modified content will be also checked by the ERCOFTAC Editorial Team with the aid of these templates. The new or modified content will then be categorised as Gold, Silver Star or Silver depending on the outcome of this checks.

Articles with confirmed high quality will be placed in the Gold category, with the authors permission, where the completed quality review forms are included for every Gold AC and UFR test case document.

    AC Quality Review template: Word format PDF format
    UFR Quality Review template: Word format PDF format