EXP 1-4 Data Quality and Accuracy: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


=Axisymmetric drop impact dynamics on a wall film of the same liquid=
=Axisymmetric drop impact dynamics on a wall film of the same liquid=
{{EXPHeaderLib
{{EXPHeader
|area=1
|area=1
|number=4
|number=4
Line 7: Line 7:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
= Data Quality and Accuracy of Measurements =
= Data Quality and Accuracy of Measurements =
Seek to address the following:
* How close is the flow to the target flow to be studied ( e.g. if the flow is supposed to be twodimensional, how well is this condition satisfied)?
* Estimation of the accuracy of measured quantities arising from given measurement technique
* Checks on global conservation of physically conserved quantities such as momentum, energy etc.
* Consistency in the measurements of different quantities.


For every set of parameters, experiments are repeated at least five
For every set of parameters, experiments are repeated at least five
Line 17: Line 12:
are verified in a post processing step, showing that the drop diameter of
are verified in a post processing step, showing that the drop diameter of
1.5 mm is matched with a deviation of less than the resolution of the
1.5 mm is matched with a deviation of less than the resolution of the
camera (31 μm). Also the target velocity is set precisely with to 1.00 m/s,
camera (31 μm). Also the target velocity is set precisely to 1.00 m/s,
1.99 m/s and 3.02 m/s with a relative error of less than ±1%. Due to the
1.99 m/s and 3.02 m/s with a relative error of less than ±1%. Due to the
well-adjusted impact parameters, the formation of the corona and hence
well-adjusted impact parameters, the formation of the corona and hence
the temporal development of its geometrical dimensions show great
the temporal development of its geometrical dimensions show great
repeatability. The mean relative standard deviation of the parameters
repeatability. The mean relative standard deviation of the parameters
d<sub>CB</sub>, dCT and hC is less than 0.45%, 1.41% and 2.23%, respectively. For
''d''<sub>CB</sub>, ''d''<sub>CT</sub> and ''h''<sub>C</sub> is less than 0.45%, 1.41% and 2.23%, respectively. For
the sake of clarity, average values of each data set are given without indicating the aforementioned standard deviation.
the sake of clarity, average values of each data set are given without indicating the aforementioned standard deviation.


Line 28: Line 23:
----
----
{{ACContribs
{{ACContribs
|authors=Bastian Stumpf, Milad Bagheri, Ilia V. Roisman, Cameron Tropea, Jeanette Hussong, Martin Wörner, Holger Marschall
|authors=Milad Bagheri, Bastian Stumpf, Ilia V. Roisman, Cameron Tropea, Jeanette Hussong, Martin Wörner, Holger Marschall
|organisation=Technical University of Darmstadt and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
|organisation=Technical University of Darmstadt and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
}}
}}
{{EXPHeaderLib
{{EXPHeader
|area=1
|area=1
|number=4
|number=4

Latest revision as of 10:01, 17 August 2023

Axisymmetric drop impact dynamics on a wall film of the same liquid

Front Page

Introduction

Review of experimental studies

Description

Experimental Set Up

Measurement Quantities and Techniques

Data Quality and Accuracy

Measurement Data and Results

Data Quality and Accuracy of Measurements

For every set of parameters, experiments are repeated at least five times to minimize the effect of random errors. The impact parameters are verified in a post processing step, showing that the drop diameter of 1.5 mm is matched with a deviation of less than the resolution of the camera (31 μm). Also the target velocity is set precisely to 1.00 m/s, 1.99 m/s and 3.02 m/s with a relative error of less than ±1%. Due to the well-adjusted impact parameters, the formation of the corona and hence the temporal development of its geometrical dimensions show great repeatability. The mean relative standard deviation of the parameters dCB, dCT and hC is less than 0.45%, 1.41% and 2.23%, respectively. For the sake of clarity, average values of each data set are given without indicating the aforementioned standard deviation.




Contributed by: Milad Bagheri, Bastian Stumpf, Ilia V. Roisman, Cameron Tropea, Jeanette Hussong, Martin Wörner, Holger Marschall — Technical University of Darmstadt and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Front Page

Introduction

Review of experimental studies

Description

Experimental Set Up

Measurement Quantities and Techniques

Data Quality and Accuracy

Measurement Data and Results


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024