Description AC3-12: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
==Introduction==  
==Introduction==  
<!--{{Demo_AC_Desc_Intro}}-->
<!--{{Demo_AC_Desc_Intro}}-->
The special features of  swirling  flows  are  utilised  in  combustion
systems in order to provide flame stabilisation and good mixing between
fuel and oxidiser. This is achieved by the central recirculation bubble
developing in front of the  burner  exit.  Swirl  burners  are  usually
operated with liquid (spray) or pulverised fuels.
In order to obtain a better understanding of the particle behaviour  in
such a complex swirling flow, detailed experiments  were  conducted  on
particle-laden  swirling  flow  emanating  into  a  pipe  expansion
(Sommerfeld and  Qiu  1991).  The  gas-particle  mixture  was  injected
centrally without swirl together with a co-flowing swirling annular gas
jet yielding a swirl number of  about  0.5.  Downstream  of  the  inlet
simultaneous measurements of gas and  particle  velocities  (all  three
components) were conducted  by  phase-Doppler  anemometry,  which  also
provided local particle size distributions and the stream-wise particle
mass flux. Two cases with different injection flow rates,  but  roughly
identical swirl number were considered.  Both  cases  showed  a  closed
central recirculation  region.  Inlet  conditions  are  available  from
highly resolved profiles 3 mm downstream of  the  edge  of  the  inflow
tubes. Since the particle mass loading is rather small two-way coupling
effects are of minor importance. Numerical computations performed  with
the finite-volume code FASTEST in connection with  the  k-?  turbulence
model  showed  reasonable  good  agreement  with  the  measurements
(Sommerfeld  and  Qiu  1993).  The  particle  phase  was  simulated  by
Lagrangian tracking also yielding a quite good agreement with  measured
velocity profiles, the particle mass flux and the number mean  particle
diameter.
==Relevance to Industrial Sector==  
==Relevance to Industrial Sector==  
<!--{{Demo_AC_Desc_Relev}}-->
<!--{{Demo_AC_Desc_Relev}}-->

Revision as of 09:59, 11 February 2013

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Particle-laden swirling flow

Application Challenge AC3-12   © copyright ERCOFTAC 2013

Introduction

The special features of swirling flows are utilised in combustion systems in order to provide flame stabilisation and good mixing between fuel and oxidiser. This is achieved by the central recirculation bubble developing in front of the burner exit. Swirl burners are usually operated with liquid (spray) or pulverised fuels.

In order to obtain a better understanding of the particle behaviour in such a complex swirling flow, detailed experiments were conducted on particle-laden swirling flow emanating into a pipe expansion (Sommerfeld and Qiu 1991). The gas-particle mixture was injected centrally without swirl together with a co-flowing swirling annular gas jet yielding a swirl number of about 0.5. Downstream of the inlet simultaneous measurements of gas and particle velocities (all three components) were conducted by phase-Doppler anemometry, which also provided local particle size distributions and the stream-wise particle mass flux. Two cases with different injection flow rates, but roughly identical swirl number were considered. Both cases showed a closed central recirculation region. Inlet conditions are available from highly resolved profiles 3 mm downstream of the edge of the inflow tubes. Since the particle mass loading is rather small two-way coupling effects are of minor importance. Numerical computations performed with the finite-volume code FASTEST in connection with the k-? turbulence model showed reasonable good agreement with the measurements (Sommerfeld and Qiu 1993). The particle phase was simulated by Lagrangian tracking also yielding a quite good agreement with measured velocity profiles, the particle mass flux and the number mean particle diameter.

Relevance to Industrial Sector

Design or Assessment Parameters

Flow Domain Geometry

Flow Physics and Fluid Dynamics Data




Contributed by: Martin Sommerfeld — Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2013