Description AC1-09: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
'''Application Challenge AC1-09'''   © copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}}  
'''Application Challenge AC1-09'''   © copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}}  
==Introduction==  
==Introduction==  
<!--{{Demo_AC_Desc_Intro}}-->
 
This test case is concerned with the prediction of vortex breakdown above a
delta wing with a sharp leading edge at high angle of attack. The main modelling
issue is the prediction of the location of the breakdown of the primary vortex
above the wing. This primary vortex is formed as the shear layer emanating from
the leading edge rolls up. Thus, it may be expected that the vortex breakdown is
sensitive to the instabilities developing in the shear layer. A second modelling
issue for this case is therefore the prediction of shear layer instabilities. A
third, minor modelling issue is pressure-induced separation: even though the
primary separation is fixed by the sharp leading edge, secondary
pressure-induced separation may occur between the primary vortex and the leading
edge.
 
For this test case, the NASA delta wing geometry of Chu and Luckring (1996) with
a sharp leading edge and a leading-edge sweep angle of $65^\circ$ is considered.
This geometry was also used in the Second International Vortex Flow Experiment
(VFE-2, \url{http://www.dlr.de/as/VFE-2}). A large set of experiments and
numerical results is available, see the Summary Report of the NATO RTO Task
Group AVT-113 (RTO TR-AVT-113, chapter 17--34, 2009). The most detailed
experiments within VFE-2 are the experiments of TU München (Furman and
Breitsamter, 2008 and 2009), which include steady and unsteady measurements of
pressure and velocity. These experiments of TU München are considered here.
 
In the EU-project ATAAC,%
\footnote{ATAAC project (Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic
Application Challenges) funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement
no.~233710}
CFD computations were performed belonging to the family of Detached Eddy
Simulation (DES). DES is a hybrid RANS--LES approach in which the attached
boundary layers are modelled with RANS while the (strongly) separated flow
regions are modelled with LES. One of the difficulties of this type of method
consists of the development of resolved turbulence as the method switches from
RANS to LES. For the present test case, this concerns the development of
instabilities in the shear layers. As will be shown, the standard DES approach
does not suffice, but modifications are necessary to induce a more rapid
development of shear-layer instabilities and full 3D turbulence.
 
In the EU-project DESider%
\footnote{DESider project (Detached Eddy Simulation for Industrial Aerodynamics)
funded by the European Union under Contract No.~AST3-CT-2003-50284 of the
European Commission}
(Haase \emph{et al.}, 2007), DES and SAS computations were performed for the
vortex breakdown above a delta wing with a sharp leading edge (Ceresola, 2009).
A different wing with a higher leading-edge sweep ($76^\circ$) was used.
Satisfactory results were obtained for the time-averaged quantities, in
particular in terms of the location of the vortex breakdown and the strength of
the secondary separation. The prediction of fluctuating quantities, such as the
RMS values of pressure and velocity components, however, was less satisfactory,
showing a larger variation between the partners and a significant deviation from
the experiment. To improve the prediction of fluctuating quantities, it was
suggested to employ a more isotropic grid in the area of the primary vortex.
This suggestion has been followed here.
 
==Relevance to Industrial Sector==  
==Relevance to Industrial Sector==  
<!--{{Demo_AC_Desc_Relev}}-->
<!--{{Demo_AC_Desc_Relev}}-->

Revision as of 12:58, 12 March 2015


Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Vortex breakdown above a delta wing with sharp leading edge

Application Challenge AC1-09   © copyright ERCOFTAC 2024

Introduction

This test case is concerned with the prediction of vortex breakdown above a delta wing with a sharp leading edge at high angle of attack. The main modelling issue is the prediction of the location of the breakdown of the primary vortex above the wing. This primary vortex is formed as the shear layer emanating from the leading edge rolls up. Thus, it may be expected that the vortex breakdown is sensitive to the instabilities developing in the shear layer. A second modelling issue for this case is therefore the prediction of shear layer instabilities. A third, minor modelling issue is pressure-induced separation: even though the primary separation is fixed by the sharp leading edge, secondary pressure-induced separation may occur between the primary vortex and the leading edge.

For this test case, the NASA delta wing geometry of Chu and Luckring (1996) with a sharp leading edge and a leading-edge sweep angle of $65^\circ$ is considered. This geometry was also used in the Second International Vortex Flow Experiment (VFE-2, \url{http://www.dlr.de/as/VFE-2}). A large set of experiments and numerical results is available, see the Summary Report of the NATO RTO Task Group AVT-113 (RTO TR-AVT-113, chapter 17--34, 2009). The most detailed experiments within VFE-2 are the experiments of TU München (Furman and Breitsamter, 2008 and 2009), which include steady and unsteady measurements of pressure and velocity. These experiments of TU München are considered here.

In the EU-project ATAAC,% \footnote{ATAAC project (Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic Application Challenges) funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement no.~233710} CFD computations were performed belonging to the family of Detached Eddy Simulation (DES). DES is a hybrid RANS--LES approach in which the attached boundary layers are modelled with RANS while the (strongly) separated flow regions are modelled with LES. One of the difficulties of this type of method consists of the development of resolved turbulence as the method switches from RANS to LES. For the present test case, this concerns the development of instabilities in the shear layers. As will be shown, the standard DES approach does not suffice, but modifications are necessary to induce a more rapid development of shear-layer instabilities and full 3D turbulence.

In the EU-project DESider% \footnote{DESider project (Detached Eddy Simulation for Industrial Aerodynamics) funded by the European Union under Contract No.~AST3-CT-2003-50284 of the European Commission} (Haase \emph{et al.}, 2007), DES and SAS computations were performed for the vortex breakdown above a delta wing with a sharp leading edge (Ceresola, 2009). A different wing with a higher leading-edge sweep ($76^\circ$) was used. Satisfactory results were obtained for the time-averaged quantities, in particular in terms of the location of the vortex breakdown and the strength of the secondary separation. The prediction of fluctuating quantities, such as the RMS values of pressure and velocity components, however, was less satisfactory, showing a larger variation between the partners and a significant deviation from the experiment. To improve the prediction of fluctuating quantities, it was suggested to employ a more isotropic grid in the area of the primary vortex. This suggestion has been followed here.

Relevance to Industrial Sector

Design or Assessment Parameters

Flow Domain Geometry

Flow Physics and Fluid Dynamics Data




Contributed by: J.C. Kok, H. van der Ven, E. Tangermann, S. Sanchi, A. Probst, L. Temmerman — '

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024