UFR 3-18 Best Practice Advice

From KBwiki
Revision as of 15:13, 6 March 2009 by David.Fowler (talk | contribs) (New page: {{UFR|front=UFR 3-18|description=UFR 3-18 Description|references=UFR 3-18 References|testcase=UFR 3-18 Test Case|evaluation=UFR 3-18 Evaluation|qualityreview=UFR 3-18 Quality Review|bestp...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References




2D Boundary layers with pressure gradients (B)

Underlying Flow Regime 3-18               © copyright ERCOFTAC 2004


Best Practice Advice

Best Practice Advice for the UFR

The case studies associated with this UFR all demonstrate good practices, which for fully turbulent 2D boundary-layer separation in an adverse pressure gradient may be summarized as follows;

-         perform grid dependency studies to eliminate sensitivities due to mesh

-         assess the effect of sensitivity to boundary conditions by varying the critical inputs

-         use higher order discretisation, especially on momentum

-         use low-Reynolds non-linear models to capture the effect of near-wall non-isotropy and flow curvature in adverse pressure gradients. k-ω models predict separation better than the equivalent k-ε models

-         LES modeling is to be recommended where ever possible

-         The V2F turbulence model demonstrates good near-wall flow predictions, and should be investigated for a wider class of problems to boost confidence in its performance.

© copyright ERCOFTAC 2004



Contributors: Fred Mendonca - Computational Dynamics Ltd


Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References