Abstr:AC6-14

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Abstract

The flow unsteadiness generated in a swirl apparatus is investigated experimentally and numerically. The swirl apparatus, shown in figure below, is designed and measured in Timişoara, Romania. The LDA measurements are performed along three survey axes in the test section to provide the characteristics of the swirling flow in the conical diffuser. The swirling flow configuration corresponds to part load operation of a Francis turbine. A series of numerical simulations is undertaken to study a highly swirling turbulent flow generated by rotor-stator interaction in a swirl generator. The purpose is to assess the applicability of different turbulence models in swirling flow with a high level of unsteadiness and a significant production and dissipation of turbulence in the flow away from the wall. Nine turbulence models are compared: four high-Reynolds number URANS, two low-Reynolds number URANS and three hybrid URANS-LES models. The URANS models are capable of capturing the main unsteady feature of this flow, the so-called helical vortex rope, which is formed by the strong centrifugal force and an on-axis recirculation region. However, the size of the on-axis recirculation region is overestimated by the URANS models. It is shown that a more detailed resolution, which is provided by the hybrid URANS-LES methods, is necessary to capture the turbulence and the coherent structures. The flow contains a strong disintegration of the vortex rope which is predicted well by the hybrid URANS-LES models. The hybrid methods also capture the blade wakes better than the other models, elucidating the wake interaction with the vortex rope. The frequency of the vortex rope is predicted well and the total turbulence (resolved and modeled), suggested by the hybrid method, corresponds reasonably well to the experimental results.

Schematic view of Timişoara swirl generator

---

Contributed by: A. Javadi^a, A. Bosioc^b, H Nilsson^a, S. Muntean^c, R. Susan-Resiga^b — ^aChalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden; ^bUniversity Polytehnica Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania; ^cCenter for Advanced Research in Engineering Sciences, Romanian Academy, Timişoara Branch, Timişoara, Romania

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

© copyright ERCOFTAC 2011