UFR 2-14 Description: Difference between revisions
Rapp.munchen (talk | contribs) |
Rapp.munchen (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
In the present study a slightly different configuration than | In the present study a slightly different configuration than | ||
in [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS- | in [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS-1a] | ||
is considered. Nevertheless, both cases belong to the same series of investigations | is considered. Nevertheless, both cases belong to the same series of investigations | ||
carried out in order to provide appropriate benchmark test cases for FSI. | carried out in order to provide appropriate benchmark test cases for FSI. | ||
Again the structural model consists of a fixed cylinder with a rubber tail (different material than before). | Again the structural model consists of a fixed cylinder with a rubber tail (different material than before). | ||
Furthermore, in contrast to [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS- | Furthermore, in contrast to [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS-1a] | ||
a rear mass is attached to the (para-)rubber plate. These modifications lead to stronger (completely two-dimensional) deflections and another | a rear mass is attached to the (para-)rubber plate. These modifications lead to stronger (completely two-dimensional) deflections and another | ||
swiveling mode of the structure. Again, strong emphasis is put on a precise description of the experimental measurements, a comprehensive discussion of the modeling in the numerical simulation (for the single field solutions as well as for the coupled problem) and the processing of the respective data to guarantee a reliable reproduction of the proposed test case with various suitable methods. A detailed description of the present test case including all details of the experimental investigations is also published in Kalmbach and Breuer (2013). | swiveling mode of the structure. Again, strong emphasis is put on a precise description of the experimental measurements, a comprehensive discussion of the modeling in the numerical simulation (for the single field solutions as well as for the coupled problem) and the processing of the respective data to guarantee a reliable reproduction of the proposed test case with various suitable methods. A detailed description of the present test case including all details of the experimental investigations is also published in Kalmbach and Breuer (2013). | ||
'''Note that the entire experimental setup and the computational framework is identical to [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS- | '''Note that the entire experimental setup and the computational framework is identical to [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS-1a]. Thus in the following these parts are not repeated but links to the corresponding descriptions provided | ||
for ''' [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS- | for ''' [http://uriah.dedi.melbourne.co.uk/w/index.php/UFR_2-13 FSI-PfS-1a] '''are given.''' | ||
<br/> | <br/> |
Revision as of 09:34, 3 May 2014
Fluid-structure interaction in turbulent flow past cylinder/plate configuration II
Flows Around Bodies
Underlying Flow Regime 2-14
Description
Introduction
See UFR 2-13
Review of previous studies
See UFR 2-13
Choice of test case
In the present study a slightly different configuration than in FSI-PfS-1a is considered. Nevertheless, both cases belong to the same series of investigations carried out in order to provide appropriate benchmark test cases for FSI.
Again the structural model consists of a fixed cylinder with a rubber tail (different material than before). Furthermore, in contrast to FSI-PfS-1a a rear mass is attached to the (para-)rubber plate. These modifications lead to stronger (completely two-dimensional) deflections and another swiveling mode of the structure. Again, strong emphasis is put on a precise description of the experimental measurements, a comprehensive discussion of the modeling in the numerical simulation (for the single field solutions as well as for the coupled problem) and the processing of the respective data to guarantee a reliable reproduction of the proposed test case with various suitable methods. A detailed description of the present test case including all details of the experimental investigations is also published in Kalmbach and Breuer (2013).
Note that the entire experimental setup and the computational framework is identical to FSI-PfS-1a. Thus in the following these parts are not repeated but links to the corresponding descriptions provided for FSI-PfS-1a are given.
Contributed by: Andreas Kalmbach, Guillaume De Nayer, Michael Breuer — Helmut-Schmidt Universität Hamburg
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024