Quality Review Documents: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{|border="0" cellpadding="5" | {|border="0" cellpadding="5" | ||
| | | | ||
| | |'''AC''' Quality Review template: | ||
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.doc|Word format]] | |[[Media:AC_QR_Template.doc|Word format]] | ||
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.pdf|PDF format]] | |[[Media:AC_QR_Template.pdf|PDF format]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | |'''UFR''' Quality Review template: | ||
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.doc|Word format]] | |[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.doc|Word format]] | ||
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.pdf|PDF format]] | |[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.pdf|PDF format]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 08:59, 27 June 2012
All Application Challenge (AC) and Underlying Flow Regime (UFR) articles within the Knowledge Base have been quality checked with the aid of the following templates. Any new or modified content will be also checked by the ERCOFTAC Editorial Team with the aid of these templates. The new or modified content will then be categorised as Gold, Silver Star or Silver depending on the outcome of this checks.
Articles with confirmed high quality will be placed in the Gold category, with the authors permission, where the completed quality review forms are included for every Gold AC and UFR test case document.
| AC Quality Review template: | Word format | PDF format | |
| UFR Quality Review template: | Word format | PDF format |