EXP 1-4 Description: Difference between revisions
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
! Impact energy !! Impact velocity !! Weber number !! Reynolds number !! Video for download | ! Impact energy !! Impact velocity !! Weber number !! Reynolds number !! Video for download | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Low || 1 m/s || 78.0 || 300 | | Low || 1 m/s || 78.0 || 300 || [[Media:S5_D1p5_H500_U1.avi|Download S5_D1p5_H500_U1]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Moderate || 2 m/s || 311.9 || 600 | | Moderate || 2 m/s || 311.9 || 600 |
Revision as of 12:19, 1 August 2023
Axisymmetric drop impact dynamics on a wall film of the same liquid
Description of Study Test Case
A sketch of the general set-up of the experiment and the geometry is shown in Fig. 3 in Section Lib:EXP 1-4 Experimental Set Up while the principal quantities measured are given in Section Lib:EXP 1-4 Measurement Quantities and Techniques.
The liquid used in the experiments is silicone oil (density ρ = 920 kg/m3, kinematic viscosity ν = 5 ⋅ 10-6 m2/s, surface tension σ = 0.0177 N/m) and the ambient gas is air (density 1.2 kg/m3, kinematic viscosity 1.52 ⋅ 10-5 m2/s). The film height h = 500 μm as well as the drop diameter D = 1.5 mm are kept fixed, resulting in the dimensionless film thickness δ = h/D = 0.33. The drop velocity U is varied from 1 to 3 m/s. Accordingly, the Weber number We = ρDU2/σ is in the range 78 – 702 while the Reynolds number Re = DU/ν is in the range 300 – 900.
Impact energy | Impact velocity | Weber number | Reynolds number | Video for download |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low | 1 m/s | 78.0 | 300 | Download S5_D1p5_H500_U1 |
Moderate | 2 m/s | 311.9 | 600 | |
High | 3 m/s | 701.7 | 900 |
Download S5_D1p5_H500_U1 Download S5_D1p5_H500_U2 Download S5_D1p5_H500_U3
Further details on the test case can be found in the following publication:
M. Bagheri, B. Stumpf, I.V. Roisman, C. Tropea, J. Hussong, M. Wörner, H. Marschall, Interfacial relaxation – Crucial for phase-field methods to capture low to high energy drop-film impacts, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 94 (2022) 108943, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.108943
Contributed by: Milad Bagheri, Bastian Stumpf, Ilia V. Roisman, Cameron Tropea, Jeanette Hussong, Martin Wörner, Holger Marschall — Technical University of Darmstadt and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024