UFR 3-36 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Erij.alaya (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Erij.alaya (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
= Evaluation = | = Evaluation = | ||
<!--{{LoremIpsum}}--> | <!--{{LoremIpsum}}--> | ||
== Comparison of | == Comparison of uDNS results with RANS results == | ||
{{Demo_UFR_Eval}} | {{Demo_UFR_Eval}} | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Revision as of 14:34, 7 November 2022
HiFi-TURB-DLR rounded step
Semi-confined flows
Underlying Flow Regime 3-36
Evaluation
Comparison of uDNS results with RANS results
Discuss how well the CFD calculations of the assessment quantities
compare with experiment and with one another. Present some key
comparisons in the form of tables or graphical plots and, where
possible, provide hyperlinks to the appropriate results database.
Results with different turbulence models covering as wide a range as
possible should be included in the discussion. However, if too many
different calculation results are available (e.g. from workshops) do
not present all the comparisons here. A selection should be made
showing results only for the most typical and practically important
models. Comprehensive comparisons can be made available via a link to
the associated databases. Finally, draw conclusions on the ability of
the models used to simulate the test case flow.
Contributed by: Erij Alaya and Cornelia Grabe — Deutsches Luft-und Raumfahrt Zentrum (DLR)
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024