UFR 3-18 Best Practice Advice: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
David.Fowler (talk | contribs) |
David.Fowler (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* use higher order discretisation, especially on momentum | * use higher order discretisation, especially on momentum | ||
* use low-Reynolds non-linear models to capture the effect of near-wall non-isotropy and flow curvature in adverse pressure gradients. k- | * use low-Reynolds non-linear models to capture the effect of near-wall non-isotropy and flow curvature in adverse pressure gradients. k-ω models predict separation better than the equivalent k-ε models | ||
* LES modeling is to be recommended where ever possible | * LES modeling is to be recommended where ever possible | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 12 March 2009
2D Boundary layers with pressure gradients (B)
Underlying Flow Regime 3-18 © copyright ERCOFTAC 2004
Best Practice Advice
Best Practice Advice for the UFR
The case studies associated with this UFR all demonstrate good practices, which for fully turbulent 2D boundary-layer separation in an adverse pressure gradient may be summarized as follows;
- perform grid dependency studies to eliminate sensitivities due to mesh
- assess the effect of sensitivity to boundary conditions by varying the critical inputs
- use higher order discretisation, especially on momentum
- use low-Reynolds non-linear models to capture the effect of near-wall non-isotropy and flow curvature in adverse pressure gradients. k-ω models predict separation better than the equivalent k-ε models
- LES modeling is to be recommended where ever possible
- The V2F turbulence model demonstrates good near-wall flow predictions, and should be investigated for a wider class of problems to boost confidence in its performance.
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2004
Contributors: Fred Mendonca - Computational Dynamics Ltd