Test Data AC6-14: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ACHeader
{{ACHeader
|area=6
|area=6
Line 9: Line 8:
=Overview of Tests=
=Overview of Tests=
<!--{{Demo_AC_Test_Over}}-->
<!--{{Demo_AC_Test_Over}}-->
==TEST CASE EXP1==
A closed loop experimental test rig was developed and measuresd at the Politehnica
A closed loop experimental test rig was developed and measuresd at the Politehnica
University of Timi\c soara, Romania, ~\cite{Resiga2007}  for investigating decelerated
University of Timi\c soara, Romania, ~\cite{Resiga2007}  for investigating decelerated
Line 24: Line 21:
(vi) a test section, marked magenta.
(vi) a test section, marked magenta.


 
==TEST CASE EXP1==
 
===Description of Experiment===
===Description of Experiment===
<!--{{Demo_AC_Test_Expt}}-->
<!--{{Demo_AC_Test_Expt}}-->

Revision as of 08:08, 11 April 2016

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Swirling flow in a conical diffuser generated with rotor-stator interaction

Application Challenge AC6-14   © copyright ERCOFTAC 2024

Overview of Tests

A closed loop experimental test rig was developed and measuresd at the Politehnica University of Timi\c soara, Romania, ~\cite{Resiga2007} for investigating decelerated swirling flows in a conical diffuser and for assessing various flow control methods. The test rig includes the following (see Fig. \ref{circuit}): (i) a main hydraulic circuit, marked blue; (ii) an auxiliary hydraulic circuit, marked red that is implemented in order to assess different control methods ~\cite{Tanasa2013,Bosioc2012}; (iii) a lower reservoir with a volume of 4$\textrm{m}^3$; (iv) a main pump that is able to provide a maximum flow rate of 40 l/s; (v) an upper reservoir equipped with a honeycomb section to provide an uniform flow at the inlet of the swirl test section, and (vi) a test section, marked magenta.

TEST CASE EXP1

Description of Experiment

Boundary Data

Measurement Errors

Measured Data

References

TEST CASE EXP2

(as per EXP 1)



Contributed by: A. Javadi, A. Bosioc, H Nilsson, S. Muntean, R. Susan-Resiga — Chalmers University of Technology

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024