Quality Review Documents: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: The documents in the Gold Domain have been subjected to independent quality review. By this means the quality of the contents is maintained at the requisite standard. The templates and c...)
 
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The documents in the Gold Domain have been subjected to independent quality review. By this means the quality of the contents is maintained at the requisite standard.  
<!--
All Application Challenge (AC) and Underlying Flow Regime (UFR) articles within the Knowledge Base have been quality checked with the aid of the following templates. Any new or modified content will be also checked by the ERCOFTAC Editorial Team with the aid of these templates. The new or modified content will then be categorised as Gold, Silver Star or Silver depending on the outcome of this checks.


The templates and check lists used in the review process are placed below:
Articles with confirmed high quality will be placed in the Gold category, with the authors permission, where the completed quality review forms are included for every Gold AC and UFR test case document.
 
{|border="0" cellpadding="5"
[http://qnetkb.cfms.org.uk/QR/D29_AC_review_template.doc Application Challenge Quality Review]
|&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 
|'''AC''' Quality Review template:
[http://qnetkb.cfms.org.uk/QR/D33_ufr_qr_template.doc Underlying Flow Regime Quality Review]
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.doc|Word format]]
|[[Media:AC_QR_Template.pdf|PDF format]]
|-
|&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
|'''UFR''' Quality Review template:
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.doc|Word format]]
|[[Media:Wiki-UFR-Quality-Review-Template.pdf|PDF format]]
|-
|}
-->

Latest revision as of 14:07, 11 February 2017