DNS 1-6 Quantification of Resolution: Difference between revisions
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Plane E is the test case geometric symmetry plane (<math>z/T=0</math>). | Plane E is the test case geometric symmetry plane (<math>z/T=0</math>). | ||
The comparison with respect to the Taylor microscale is shown in [[lib:DNS_1-6_quantification_#figure2|Fig. 2]]. | The comparison with respect to the Taylor microscale is shown in [[lib:DNS_1-6_quantification_#figure2|Fig. 2]]. | ||
For all the planes extracted, the ratio <math>{\Delta}/{\eta_{T}}</math> is lower than 0.6. | |||
Accordingly, the current space resolution is sufficient to capture turbulence scales in the intertial range. | |||
In [[lib:DNS_1-6_quantification_#figure3|Fig. 3]] is reported the comparison with respect to the Kolmogorov length scale. | In [[lib:DNS_1-6_quantification_#figure3|Fig. 3]] is reported the comparison with respect to the Kolmogorov length scale. | ||
It is commonly accepted that DNS requirements are achieved when <math>{\Delta}/{\eta_{K}}\leq 5</math>. | It is commonly accepted that DNS requirements are achieved when <math>{\Delta}/{\eta_{K}}\leq 5</math>. |
Revision as of 14:23, 16 February 2023
Quantification of resolution
This section provides details of the solution accuracy obtained by tackling the wing-body junction DNS with MIGALE. After providing details of the mesh resolution in comparison with spatial turbulent scales, a discussion on the closure of the Reynolds stress equations budgets is given.
Mesh resolution
The mesh resolution is quantified by comparing the mesh characteristic length () with the characteristic lengths of the turbulence, i.e., the Taylor microscale () and Kolmogorov length scale (). Here, the mesh characteristic length takes into account the degree of the DG polynomial approximation. In particular, it is defined as the cubic root of the ratio between the mesh element volume and the number of DoFs within the mesh element per equation
In order to analize the mesh resolution, five planes have been extracted within the highly resolved region of the turbulent flow, see Fig. 1. Planes A and B are parallel to the horizontal solid wall () and are placed at and , respectively. Planes C and D are perpendicular to the streamwise direction and are extracted at (location of maximum wing thickness) and (behind the wing trailing edge), respectively, being the wing leading edge streamwise coordinate. Plane E is the test case geometric symmetry plane ().
The comparison with respect to the Taylor microscale is shown in Fig. 2. For all the planes extracted, the ratio is lower than 0.6. Accordingly, the current space resolution is sufficient to capture turbulence scales in the intertial range.
In Fig. 3 is reported the comparison with respect to the Kolmogorov length scale. It is commonly accepted that DNS requirements are achieved when . In all planes considered it is clearly visible a region around the wing in which the ratio is greater than 8, even if lower than 10. This region is characterized by the presence of the horse-shoe vortex. Besides, for plane D and E it can be noticed an additional region of high ratio downstream the wing trailing edge, close to the symmetry plane. This is the region where the turbulent boundary layer developed above the wing solid wall is moving downstream and generating a wake. As outcome, the DNS requirements are not fulfilled for the current simulation. For such reason the present study is referred to as under-resolved DNS (uDNS). For future highly resolved simulations mesh refinement is advised in these regions. We want to point out that the accurate simulation of the wake behind the wing away from the horizontal boundary layer is out of the scope of the current computational campaign and, thus, the low mesh resolution in such region was expected as the computational grid has been coarsened in the normal region due to computational cost constraints.
Figure 1: Wing-body junction. Extracted planes for mesh resolution analisys. |
Figure 2: Wing-body junction. Relation between the mesh size and the Taylor microscale. |
Figure 3: Wing-body junction. Relation between the mesh size and the Kolmogorov length scale. |
The average wall resolution in streamwise (), spanwise () and wall-normal () directions at different streamwise locations is reported in Tab. 2.
Solution verification
One way to verify that the DNS are properly resolved is to examine the residuals of the Reynolds-
stress budget equations. These residuals are among the statistical volume data to be provided as
described in Statistical Data section.
Contributed by: Alessandro Colombo (UNIBG), Francesco Carlo Massa (UNIBG), Michael Leschziner (ICL/ERCOFTAC), Jean-Baptiste Chapelier (ONERA) — University of Bergamo (UNIBG), ICL (Imperial College London), ONERA
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024