UFR 3-36 Description: Difference between revisions
Erij.alaya (talk | contribs) (New article page for UFR_3-36_Description) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Lib:Create_Ercoftac_Article_Form = | = Lib:Create_Ercoftac_Article_Form = | ||
{{ | {{UFRHeaderLib | ||
|area=3 | |area=3 | ||
|number=36 | |number=36 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== == | == == | ||
=== Underlying Flow Regime 3-36 === | === Underlying Flow Regime 3-36 === | ||
= Description = | = Description = | ||
<!--{{LoremIpsum}}--> | <!--{{LoremIpsum}}--> | ||
Revision as of 09:39, 5 September 2022
Lib:Create_Ercoftac_Article_Form
Underlying Flow Regime 3-36
Description
Introduction
Give a brief overview of the UFR in question. Describe the main characteristics of the type of flow. In particular, what are the underlying flow physics which characterise this UFR and must be captured by the CFD methods? If the UFR considered here is of special relevance for a particular AC featured in the KB, this should be mentioned.
Review of UFR studies and choice of test case
Provide a brief review of past studies of this UFR which have included
test case comparisons of experimental measurements with CFD results.
Identify your chosen study (or studies) on which the document will
focus. State the test-case underlying the study and briefly explain how
well this represents the UFR? Give reasons for this choice (e.g a well
constructed test case, a recognised international comparison exercise,
accurate measurements, good quality control, a rich variety of
turbulence or physical models assessed etc.) . If possible, the study
should be taken from established data bases. Indicate whether of not
the experiments have been designed for the purpose of CFD validation
(desirable but not mandatory)?
Contributed by: Erij Alaya and Cornelia Grabe — Deutsches Luft-und Raumfahrt Zentrum (DLR)
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024