CFD Simulations AC7-01: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Application Challenge AC7-01''' © copyright ERCOFTAC 2019 | '''Application Challenge AC7-01''' © copyright ERCOFTAC 2019 | ||
=CFD Simulations= | =CFD Simulations= | ||
==Overview of CFD Simulations== | |||
LES and RANS simulations were carried out in the benchmark geometry. The details of | |||
these numerical tests and their predicted deposition are given in the following paragraphs. | |||
In summary, the main differences in LES and RANS simulations are: | |||
#Computational meshes | |||
#Turbulence modeling | |||
#Different outlet boundary conditions | |||
#In RANS simulations a turbulent dispersion model was used to account for the effect | |||
of turbulence on particle transport. | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 09:45, 4 October 2019
Aerosol deposition in the human upper airways
Application Challenge AC7-01 © copyright ERCOFTAC 2019
CFD Simulations
Overview of CFD Simulations
LES and RANS simulations were carried out in the benchmark geometry. The details of these numerical tests and their predicted deposition are given in the following paragraphs. In summary, the main differences in LES and RANS simulations are:
- Computational meshes
- Turbulence modeling
- Different outlet boundary conditions
- In RANS simulations a turbulent dispersion model was used to account for the effect
of turbulence on particle transport.
Contributed by: *** — ***
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2019