Evaluation AC2-10: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Comparison of CFD Results with Experimental Data== | ==Comparison of CFD Results with Experimental Data== | ||
===In-Cylinder Pressure=== | ===In-Cylinder Pressure=== | ||
<div id="figure18"></div> | |||
{|align="center" | |||
|[[Image:AC2-10_Avg_InCylinder_Pressure.png|600px]] | |||
|- | |||
|align="center"|'''Figure 18:''' In-Cylinder pressure curve with enlargement at 0\,CAD | |||
|} | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 14:55, 9 October 2018
Internal combustion engine flows for motored operation
Application Challenge AC2-10 © copyright ERCOFTAC 2024
Evaluation
Comparison of CFD Results with Experimental Data
In-Cylinder Pressure
Figure 18: In-Cylinder pressure curve with enlargement at 0\,CAD |
Contributed by: Carl Philip Ding,Rene Honza, Elias Baum, Andreas Dreizler — Fachgebiet Reaktive Strömungen und Messtechnik (RSM),Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Contributed by: Brian Peterson — School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Scotland UK
Contributed by: Chao He , Wibke Leudesdorff, Guido Kuenne, Benjamin Böhm, Amsini Sadiki, Johannes Janicka — Fachgebiet Energie und Kraftwerkstechnik (EKT), Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Contributed by: Peter Janas, Andreas Kempf — Institut für Verbrennung und Gasdynamik (IVG), Lehrstuhl für Fluiddynamik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Contributed by: Stefan Buhl, Christian Hasse — Fachgebiet Simulation reaktiver Thermo-Fluid Systeme (STFS), Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany; former: Professur Numerische Thermofluiddynamik (NTFD), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2018