Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New article page for AC6-14)
 
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
=Abstract=
=Abstract=
<!--{{Demo_AC_Guidance}}-->
<!--{{Demo_AC_Guidance}}-->
This test case concerns flow unsteadiness generated in a swirl apparatus which was investigated experimentally
and numerically.
The swirl apparatus, shown in the figure below, was designed in
Timi&#351;oara, Romania, where also the measurements were carried out. LDA measurements were performed along three survey axes in the test section to
provide the characteristics of the swirling flow in the conical diffuser.
The swirling flow configuration corresponds to part-load operation of a Francis turbine.
A series of numerical simulations undertaken to study the highly swirling turbulent
flow generated by rotor-stator interaction in the test-case swirl generator are reported here.
The purpose is to assess the applicability of different turbulence models in swirling
flow with a high level of unsteadiness and a significant production and dissipation of
turbulence in the flow away from the wall.
Nine turbulence models are compared: four high-Reynolds number URANS,
two low-Reynolds number URANS and three hybrid URANS-LES models.
The URANS models are capable of capturing the main unsteady features of this flow,
the so-called helical vortex rope, which is formed by the strong centrifugal force and
an on-axis recirculation region.
However, the size of the on-axis recirculation region is overestimated by the URANS
models.
It is shown that a more detailed resolution, which is provided by the hybrid URANS-LES
methods, is necessary to capture the turbulence and the coherent structures.
The flow contains a strong disintegration of the vortex rope which is predicted well by
the hybrid URANS-LES models.
The hybrid methods also capture the blade wakes better than the other models,
elucidating the wake interaction with the vortex rope.
The frequency of the vortex rope is predicted well, and the total turbulence
(resolved and modeled) as delivered by the hybrid method corresponds reasonably well to
the experimental results.
{|align="center"
|[[Image:AC6-14_JavadiFig1.png|350px]]
|-
|align="center"| Schematic view of Timi&#351;oara swirl generator
|}
<br/>
<br/>
----
----
{{ACContribs
{{ACContribs
|authors=A. Javadi, A. Bosioc, H Nilsson, S. Muntean, R. Susan-Resiga
| authors=A. Javadi<sup>a</sup>, A. Bosioc<sup>b</sup>, H Nilsson<sup>a</sup>, S. Muntean<sup>c</sup>, R. Susan-Resiga<sup>b</sup>
|organisation=Chalmers University of Technology
| organisation=<sup>a</sup>Chalmers University of Technology, G&ouml;teborg, Sweden; <sup>b</sup>University Polytehnica Timi&#351;oara, Timi&#351;oara, Romania; <sup>c</sup>Center for Advanced Research in Engineering Sciences, Romanian Academy, Timi&#351;oara Branch, Timi&#351;oara, Romania
}}
}}
{{ACHeader
{{ACHeader

Latest revision as of 09:54, 30 August 2016


Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Swirling flow in a conical diffuser generated with rotor-stator interaction

Application Area 6: Turbomachinery Internal Flow

Application Challenge AC6-14

Abstract

This test case concerns flow unsteadiness generated in a swirl apparatus which was investigated experimentally and numerically. The swirl apparatus, shown in the figure below, was designed in Timişoara, Romania, where also the measurements were carried out. LDA measurements were performed along three survey axes in the test section to provide the characteristics of the swirling flow in the conical diffuser. The swirling flow configuration corresponds to part-load operation of a Francis turbine. A series of numerical simulations undertaken to study the highly swirling turbulent flow generated by rotor-stator interaction in the test-case swirl generator are reported here. The purpose is to assess the applicability of different turbulence models in swirling flow with a high level of unsteadiness and a significant production and dissipation of turbulence in the flow away from the wall. Nine turbulence models are compared: four high-Reynolds number URANS, two low-Reynolds number URANS and three hybrid URANS-LES models. The URANS models are capable of capturing the main unsteady features of this flow, the so-called helical vortex rope, which is formed by the strong centrifugal force and an on-axis recirculation region. However, the size of the on-axis recirculation region is overestimated by the URANS models. It is shown that a more detailed resolution, which is provided by the hybrid URANS-LES methods, is necessary to capture the turbulence and the coherent structures. The flow contains a strong disintegration of the vortex rope which is predicted well by the hybrid URANS-LES models. The hybrid methods also capture the blade wakes better than the other models, elucidating the wake interaction with the vortex rope. The frequency of the vortex rope is predicted well, and the total turbulence (resolved and modeled) as delivered by the hybrid method corresponds reasonably well to the experimental results.


AC6-14 JavadiFig1.png
Schematic view of Timişoara swirl generator




Contributed by: A. Javadia, A. Bosiocb, H Nilssona, S. Munteanc, R. Susan-Resigab — aChalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden; bUniversity Polytehnica Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania; cCenter for Advanced Research in Engineering Sciences, Romanian Academy, Timişoara Branch, Timişoara, Romania

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2011