UFR 3-32 Description: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
=== Underlying Flow Regime 3-32 ===  
=== Underlying Flow Regime 3-32 ===  
= Description =
= Description =
<!--{{LoremIpsum}}-->
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
{{Demo_UFR_Desc_Intro}}
The problem of the unsteadiness in shock wave/boundary layer interactions
(SWBLI) is challenging in many  respects.  A  more  general  question  is
related to the unsteadiness or "breathing" of separated  flows,  whatever
the regime, subsonic or supersonic. This is a problem that  is  important
for  both  applications  and  basic  research.  In  many  aeronautical
applications,  such  as  aircraft  profiles,  air  intakes,  turbines  or
compressors, shock waves are formed and generally lead to separation. The
resulting separation bubbles are unsteady, in the sense that they produce
frequencies much lower (by at least two orders  of  magnitude)  than  the
identified frequencies of the turbulent flow. Another  difficulty  arises
if high-speed flows are considered, in which  case  the  unsteadiness  is
also dependent on Mach number.
== Review of UFR studies and choice of test case ==
== Review of UFR studies and choice of test case ==
{{Demo_UFR_Desc_Review}}
{{Demo_UFR_Desc_Review}}

Revision as of 08:20, 12 August 2013

Planar shock-wave boundary-layer interaction

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Semi-confined Flows

Underlying Flow Regime 3-32

Description

Introduction

The problem of the unsteadiness in shock wave/boundary layer interactions (SWBLI) is challenging in many respects. A more general question is related to the unsteadiness or "breathing" of separated flows, whatever the regime, subsonic or supersonic. This is a problem that is important for both applications and basic research. In many aeronautical applications, such as aircraft profiles, air intakes, turbines or compressors, shock waves are formed and generally lead to separation. The resulting separation bubbles are unsteady, in the sense that they produce frequencies much lower (by at least two orders of magnitude) than the identified frequencies of the turbulent flow. Another difficulty arises if high-speed flows are considered, in which case the unsteadiness is also dependent on Mach number.

Review of UFR studies and choice of test case

Provide a brief review of past studies of this UFR which have included test case comparisons of experimental measurements with CFD results. Identify your chosen study (or studies) on which the document will focus. State the test-case underlying the study and briefly explain how well this represents the UFR? Give reasons for this choice (e.g a well constructed test case, a recognised international comparison exercise, accurate measurements, good quality control, a rich variety of turbulence or physical models assessed etc.) . If possible, the study should be taken from established data bases. Indicate whether of not the experiments have been designed for the purpose of CFD validation (desirable but not mandatory)?



Contributed by: Jean-Paul Dussauge — Orange

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024