Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (moved UFR 4-16 to Lib:UFR 4-16)
Line 10: Line 10:
= Abstract =
= Abstract =


{{Demo_UFR_Guidance}}
<!--{{Demo_UFR_Guidance}}-->
The incompressible flow developing fully in  a  three-dimensional  duct  and
then expanding into a diffuser, whose upper  wall  and  one  side  wall  are
appropriately deflected, has been  investigated  experimentally  (Cherry  et
al., 2008, 2009) and computationally  by  means  of  DNS  (Direct  Numerical
Simulation; Ohlsson et al., 2009,  2010),  LES  (Large-Eddy  Simulation)  as
well as by different hybrid LES/RANS  and  RANS  (Reynolds-Averaged  Navier-
Stokes) models. The results  of  the  computational  studies  were  analysed
along with the experimental reference  database  in  the  framework  of  two
workshops on "Refined  Turbulence  Modelling"  (Steiner  et  al.,  2009  and
Jakirlic et al., 2010) organized by the ERCOFTAC Special Interest  Group  on
Turbulence Modelling (SIG15). Two three-dimensional diffuser  configurations
differing in terms of the values of the expansion angles  -  the  upper-wall
expansion angle is reduced from 11.3o (diffuser 1) to 9o (diffuser  2);  the
side-wall expansion angle  is  increased  from  2.56o  (diffuser  1)  to  4o
(diffuser 2) - were considered. These slight modifications in  the  diffuser
geometry led to substantial changes in the flow structure  with  respect  to
the onset, location, shape and  size  of  the  three-dimensional  separation
pattern associated with the corner separation and corner reattachment,  Fig.
1. The inflow in both  considered  cases  is  characterized  by  a  Reynolds
number Reh=10000, based on the inlet duct height.
 
<br/>
<br/>
----
----

Revision as of 17:57, 24 July 2012

Flow in a 3D diffuser

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References

Confined flows

Underlying Flow Regime 4-16

Abstract

The incompressible flow developing fully in a three-dimensional duct and then expanding into a diffuser, whose upper wall and one side wall are appropriately deflected, has been investigated experimentally (Cherry et al., 2008, 2009) and computationally by means of DNS (Direct Numerical Simulation; Ohlsson et al., 2009, 2010), LES (Large-Eddy Simulation) as well as by different hybrid LES/RANS and RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier- Stokes) models. The results of the computational studies were analysed along with the experimental reference database in the framework of two workshops on "Refined Turbulence Modelling" (Steiner et al., 2009 and Jakirlic et al., 2010) organized by the ERCOFTAC Special Interest Group on Turbulence Modelling (SIG15). Two three-dimensional diffuser configurations differing in terms of the values of the expansion angles - the upper-wall expansion angle is reduced from 11.3o (diffuser 1) to 9o (diffuser 2); the side-wall expansion angle is increased from 2.56o (diffuser 1) to 4o (diffuser 2) - were considered. These slight modifications in the diffuser geometry led to substantial changes in the flow structure with respect to the onset, location, shape and size of the three-dimensional separation pattern associated with the corner separation and corner reattachment, Fig. 1. The inflow in both considered cases is characterized by a Reynolds number Reh=10000, based on the inlet duct height.




Contributed by: Suad Jakirlic — Technische Universität Darmstadt

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References


© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024