UFR 7-01 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
(New article page for UFR_7-01_Evaluation) |
(New article page for UFR_7-01_Evaluation) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Thoughts of a poor old sod = | |||
{{UFRHeader | {{UFRHeader | ||
|area=7 | |area=7 | ||
|number=01 | |number=01 | ||
}} | }} | ||
__TOC__ | |||
= | == Flummery & Flannery == | ||
=== Underlying Flow Regime 7-01 === | |||
Underlying Flow Regime 7-01 | = Evaluation = | ||
<!--{{LoremIpsum}}--> | |||
== Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments == | |||
== | {{Demo_UFR_Eval}} | ||
<br/> | |||
---- | |||
{{ACContribs | |||
|authors=JB Priestley | |||
|organisation=Yorkshire | |||
}} | |||
{{UFRHeader | {{UFRHeader | ||
|area=7 | |area=7 | ||
| Line 20: | Line 23: | ||
}} | }} | ||
© copyright ERCOFTAC | © copyright ERCOFTAC {{CURRENTYEAR}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:32, 17 February 2011
Thoughts of a poor old sod
Flummery & Flannery
Underlying Flow Regime 7-01
Evaluation
Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments
Discuss how well the CFD calculations of the assessment quantities
compare with experiment and with one another. Present some key
comparisons in the form of tables or graphical plots and, where
possible, provide hyperlinks to the appropriate results database.
Results with different turbulence models covering as wide a range as
possible should be included in the discussion. However, if too many
different calculation results are available (e.g. from workshops) do
not present all the comparisons here. A selection should be made
showing results only for the most typical and practically important
models. Comprehensive comparisons can be made available via a link to
the associated databases. Finally, draw conclusions on the ability of
the models used to simulate the test case flow.
Contributed by: JB Priestley — Yorkshire
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024