Difference between revisions of "UFR 3-01 References"

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 257: Line 257:
  
 
{{UFR|front=UFR 3-01|description=UFR 3-01 Description|references=UFR 3-01 References|testcase=UFR 3-01 Test Case|evaluation=UFR 3-01 Evaluation|qualityreview=UFR 3-01 Quality Review|bestpractice=UFR 3-01 Best Practice Advice|relatedACs=UFR 3-01 Related ACs}}
 
{{UFR|front=UFR 3-01|description=UFR 3-01 Description|references=UFR 3-01 References|testcase=UFR 3-01 Test Case|evaluation=UFR 3-01 Evaluation|qualityreview=UFR 3-01 Quality Review|bestpractice=UFR 3-01 Best Practice Advice|relatedACs=UFR 3-01 Related ACs}}
 
 
[[Category:Underlying Flow Regime]]
 

Revision as of 19:25, 29 August 2009

Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References




Boundary layer interacting with wakes under adverse pressure gradient - NLR 7301 high lift configuration

Underlying Flow Regime 3-01               © copyright ERCOFTAC 2004


References

[1] Carlson, J.R., Duquesne, N., Rumsey, C.L., Gatski, T.B. Computation of turbulent wake flows in variable pressure gradient. Computer & Fluids, Vol. 30, 2001, pp. 161-187.

[2] Rumsey, C.L., Ying, S.X. Prediction of high lift: review of present CFD capability. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 38, 2002, pp. 145-180.

[3] Squire, L.C. Interactions between wakes and boundary-layers. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 26, 1989, pp. 261-288.

[4] Zhou, M.D, and Squire, L.C. The interaction of a wake with a turbulent boundary layer. The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 89, 1985, pp.72-81.

[5] Liu, X., Thomas, F.O., Nelson, R.C. An experimental investigation of wake development in arbitrary pressure gradient. AIAA Paper 99-0677, 1999.

[6] Kyriakides, N.K., Kastrinakis, E.G., Nychas, S.G., Goulas, A. Proceedings Inst. Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 210, 1996, p. 167.

[7] Piomelli, U., Choudhari, M.M., Ovchinnikov V., Balaras, E. Numerical simulations of wake/boundary layer interactions. AIAA 2003-0975, 2003.

[8] Berg, B. van der. Boundary Layer Measurements on a Two-Dimensional Wing with Flap, NLR TR 79009 U, 1979.

[9] Haase, W. et al. EUROVAL - An European Initiative on Validation of CFD codes. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 42, 1992.

[10] Haase, W. et al. ECARP- European Computational Aerodynamics Research Projects: Validation of CFD Codes and Assessment of Turbulence Models. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 58, 1997.

[11] Marini M. and Paoli R. Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Through the use of a Database. Proceedings ECCOMAS 2001.

[12] Gooden J.H.M and Lent M. Hot-Wire Measurements in the Two-Dimensional Wing Wake above a Trailing Edge Flap at a Condition Close to Maximum Lift, NLR CR 91038 C (Restricted), 1991.

[13] Larsson, T. Separated and high-lift flows over single and multi-element airfoils. ICAS 94-5.7.3, 1994.

[14] Godin, P, Zingg, D.W., Nelson, T.E. High-lift Aerodynamic computations with one and two equation turbulence models. AIAA Journal Vol. 35, No 2, 1997.

[15] Baldwin, B.S., Lomax, H. Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA-paper 78-257, 1978.

[16] Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.A. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439, 1992.

[17] Jones, W.P., Launder, B.E. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation turbulence model.. Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 15, 1972, pp. 301-314.

[18] Launder, B.E., Sharma, B.I. Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 1, 1974, p. 131.

[19] Chien, K. Prediction of channel and boundary layer flows with a low Reynolds number turbulence model. AIAA Journal, Vol. 20, 1982, pp. 33-38.

[20] Lam, C.K.G., Bremhorst, K. A modified form of the k-ε model for predicting wall turbulence. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 103, 1981, pp. 456-460.

[21] Menter, F.R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, 1994, pp. 1598-1605.

[22] Granville, P.S. Baldwin-Lomax factors for turbulent boundary layers in pressure gradients. AIAA Journal Vol. 25, 1987, pp. 1624-1627.

[23] Cebeci, T. and Smith, A.M.O. Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layers. Series in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics XV, Academic Press, 1974.

24] Kalitzin, G., Gould, A.R.B and Benton, J.J. Application of two-equation turbulence models in aircraft design, AIAA Paper 96-0327, 1996.

[25] Speziale, C.G., Abid, R. and Anderson, E.C. Critical evaluation of two-equation models for near wall turbulence. AIAA Journal, Vol. 30, 1992, pp. 324-331.

[26] Wolfshtein, M. The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient. Int. Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 12, 1969, p. 139.

[27] Shih, T-H., Zhu, J. and Lumley, J.L. A realisable Reynolds stress algebraic model. NASA TM 105993, 1993.

[28] An. A Selection of Experimental Test Cases for the Validation of CFD Codes. AGARD AR 303, 1994.

Appendix A: Figures from ECARP [10]

Remark: the figures are scanned from the ECARP Book [10], and use the figure numbering and captions of the original text.


Reference in Figures
Turbulence Model
C+W
Chien + Wolfshtein k-ε
KG
Kalitzin-Gould k-τ
GRB
Granville/Baldwin-Lomax
C
Chien k-ε
BL
Baldwin-Lomax
JL
Launder-Sharma-Yap k-ε
C+LSC
Chien k-ε + length scale correction
LB
Lam-Bremhorst k-ε
CS
Cebeci-Smith
M+SST
Menter (incl SST correction)
LeB
Le Balleur
SJL-W
Jones-Launder-Wolfshtein k-ε
SJL-W+SST
Above + SST
SLZ-W
Shih-Lumley-Zhu-Wolfshtein non-linear k-ε

 

Table 4: Index to Turbulence Models used in ECARP figures reproduced on the following pages.


U3-01d32 files image004.jpg


 


U3-01d32 files image006.jpg  


U3-01d32 files image008.jpg  


U3-01d32 files image010.jpg  


U3-01d32 files image012.jpg  


U3-01d32 files image014.jpg  


U3-01d32 files image016.jpg  

U3-01d32 files image018.jpg



 

U3-01d32 files image021.gif
U3-01d32 files image023.jpg  


U3-01d32 files image025.jpg  



Appendix B: Figures from Godin [14]


U3-01d32 files image027.jpg


Fig. 14: Pressure Coefficient NLR 7301 2.6% gap α = 13.1°


U3-01d32 files image029.jpg
Fig. 15: Skin friction coefficient NLR 7301 2.6% gap α = 13.1°


 
U3-01d32 files image031.jpg
 
Fig. 16: Velocity Profiles NLR 7301 2.6% gap α = 13.1°


 
 
U3-01d32 files image033.jpg
 
Fig. 17: Turbulent shear stress profiles NLR 7301 2.6% gap α = 13.1°

© copyright ERCOFTAC 2004



Contributors: Jan Vos - CFS Engineering SA


Front Page

Description

Test Case Studies

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

References