UFR 2-12 Description: Difference between revisions
(New article page for UFR_2-12_Description) |
(New article page for UFR_2-12_Description) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{ACContribs | {{ACContribs | ||
| authors=A. Garbaruk, M. Shur and M. Strelets | | authors=A. Garbaruk, M. Shur and M. Strelets | ||
| organisation= | | organisation=New Technologies and Services LLC (NTS) and St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{UFRHeader | {{UFRHeader | ||
Revision as of 08:12, 26 October 2012
Turbulent Flow Past Two-Body Configurations
Flows Around Bodies
Underlying Flow Regime 2-12
Description
Introduction
Give a brief overview of the UFR in question. Describe the main characteristics of the type of flow. In particular, what are the underlying flow physics which characterise this UFR and must be captured by the CFD methods? If the UFR considered here is of special relevance for a particular AC featured in the KB, this should be mentioned.
Review of UFR studies and choice of test case
Provide a brief review of past studies of this UFR which have included
test case comparisons of experimental measurements with CFD results.
Identify your chosen study (or studies) on which the document will
focus. State the test-case underlying the study and briefly explain how
well this represents the UFR? Give reasons for this choice (e.g a well
constructed test case, a recognised international comparison exercise,
accurate measurements, good quality control, a rich variety of
turbulence or physical models assessed etc.) . If possible, the study
should be taken from established data bases. Indicate whether of not
the experiments have been designed for the purpose of CFD validation
(desirable but not mandatory)?
Contributed by: A. Garbaruk, M. Shur and M. Strelets — New Technologies and Services LLC (NTS) and St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024