|
|
| (21 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ='''RAE M2155 Wing'''= | + | {{AC|front=AC 1-02|description=Description_AC1-02|testdata=Test Data_AC1-02|cfdsimulations=CFD Simulations_AC1-02|evaluation=Evaluation_AC1-02|qualityreview=Quality Review_AC1-02|bestpractice=Best Practice Advice_AC1-02|relatedUFRs=Related UFRs_AC1-02}} |
| | | | |
| − | '''Application Challenge 1-02''' © copyright ERCOFTAC 2004
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | + | [{{filepath:A1-02d29.pdf}} '''Click here to view the Quality Review'''] |
| | | | |
| − | {| align="center" border="1"
| |
| − | !align="left" | Application Challenge (AC) Title: RAE M2155 Wing
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | !align="left" | AC Author and Thematic Area: P. Catalano (CIRA) and A. Hutton (DERA), TA1
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | !align="left" | Reviewer (Name/Organisation) : J.B. Vos/CFS Engineering
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" width="600" border="1"
| |
| − | ! align="left" | 1
| |
| − | ! TOP LEVEL CHECK
| |
| − | ! YES
| |
| − | ! NO
| |
| − | ! CO
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 1.1
| |
| − | | Is this AC an Industrial test case for judging CFD competency?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 1.2
| |
| − | | Are the design/assessment parameters ([[DOAPs#DOAPs:_Design_or_Assessment_Parameters|DOAPs]]) defined?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 1.3
| |
| − | | Have these assessment parameters been measured?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 1.4
| |
| − | | Are CFD calculations available ?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | ! H
| |
| − | ! M
| |
| − | ! L
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 1.5
| |
| − | | Importance of AC to Industrial Sector (IS)?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | align="left" colspan="5"| <b>Comments:</b>
| |
| − | Only the aerodynamic coefficients are mentioned as DOAP’s, which can be considered as somewhat limited,
| |
| − | in particular for turbulent flows.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Remark that the RAE M2155 wing has been used in different European funded projects,
| |
| − | as for example AVTAC and FLOWNET.
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" border="1"
| |
| − | ! colspan="2" | Please identify Underlying Flow Regimes for this AC:
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | width="40" | 3.1
| |
| − | | Reattaching shear layers/pressure recovery
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 3.1
| |
| − | | Shock-boundary layer interaction
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 3.1
| |
| − | | Boundary layer under adverse pressure gradient causing separation
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 3.2
| |
| − | | 3D Skewed boundary layer
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 3.4
| |
| − | | Wing – body (ground plate) junction
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==='''DETAILED CHECK'''===
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" width="600" border="1"
| |
| − | ! align="left" | 2
| |
| − | ! GEOMETRY
| |
| − | ! YES
| |
| − | ! NO
| |
| − | ! CO
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 2.1
| |
| − | | Is the geometry fully specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 2.2
| |
| − | | Are the locations of boundaries specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 2.3
| |
| − | | Are the boundary types specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 2.4
| |
| − | | Is the geometry clearly illustrated?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 2.5
| |
| − | | Is the geometry available in digital form?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="5" | <b>Comments:</b>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The geometry is available as an ASCII file in the format of 33 sections of 145 points each. Transition is fixed at 5% local chord, and a geometric definition of this line is available.
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" width="600" border="1"
| |
| − | ! align="left" | 3
| |
| − | ! FLOW PHYSICS AND FLUID DYNAMICS DATA
| |
| − | ! YES
| |
| − | ! NO
| |
| − | ! CO
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 3.1
| |
| − | | Are the physics of key processes identified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 3.2
| |
| − | | Are the properties of the fluid specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 3.3
| |
| − | | Are the governing non-dimensional parameters ([[DOAPs#GNDPs:_Governing_Non-Dimensional_Parameters|GNDPs]]) identified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="5" | <b>Comments:</b>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==='''TEST DATA'''===
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" width="600" border="1"
| |
| − | ! align="left" | 4
| |
| − | ! OVERVIEW of Test Data
| |
| − | ! YES
| |
| − | ! NO
| |
| − | ! CO
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 4.1
| |
| − | | Have all the experiments been adequately defined?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 4.2
| |
| − | | Are the measurement techniques used described?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 4.3
| |
| − | | Has a summary of test runs been provided (matrix)?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 4.4
| |
| − | | Are there any important scaling issues/simplifications/uncertainties associated with the test geometry?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | ! H
| |
| − | ! M
| |
| − | ! L
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 4.5
| |
| − | | Impact of uncertainties on [[DOAPs#DOAPs:_Design_or_Assessment_Parameters|DOAPs]] ?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="5" | <b>Comments:</b>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" width="600" border="1"
| |
| − | ! align="left" | 5
| |
| − | | <b>EXP1</b> (Copy and complete this section for each set of test data)
| |
| − | ! YES
| |
| − | ! NO
| |
| − | ! CO
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.1
| |
| − | | Is the experimental setup defined unambiguously?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.2
| |
| − | | Are the geometrical parameters defined?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.3
| |
| − | | Are the values of [[DOAPs#GNDPs:_Governing_Non-Dimensional_Parameters|GNDPs]] specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.4
| |
| − | | Are the measured parameters ([[DOAPs#MPs:_Measured_Parameters|MPs]]) fully described?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.5
| |
| − | | Are measured data available in digital format?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.6
| |
| − | | Have conditions at all boundaries been specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.7
| |
| − | | Are any of the boundary data uncertain?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.8
| |
| − | | Is a realistic estimate of data accuracy given?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | ! H
| |
| − | ! M
| |
| − | ! L
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 5.9
| |
| − | | Impact of uncertainties on [[DOAPs#DOAPs:_Design_or_Assessment_Parameters|DOAPs]] ?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="5" | <b>Comments:</b>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==='''CFD SIMULATIONS'''===
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" width="600" border="1"
| |
| − | ! align="left" | 6
| |
| − | ! OVERVIEW of CFD Simulations
| |
| − | ! YES
| |
| − | ! NO
| |
| − | ! CO
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 6.1
| |
| − | | Have all the CFD runs been adequately defined?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 6.2
| |
| − | | Are the solution techniques used described?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 6.3
| |
| − | | Has a summary of runs been provided (matrix)?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 6.4
| |
| − | | Are there any important uncertainties associated with the computational domain geometry?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="2" |
| |
| − | ! H
| |
| − | ! M
| |
| − | ! L
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 6.5
| |
| − | | Impact of uncertainties on [[DOAPs#DOAPs:_Design_or_Assessment_Parameters|DOAPs]] ?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="5" | <b>Comments</b>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The provided test matrix does not follow the standard layout.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| align="center" width="600" border="1"
| |
| − | ! align="left" | 7
| |
| − | | <b>CFD1</b> (Copy and complete this section for each set of CFD data)
| |
| − | ! YES
| |
| − | ! NO
| |
| − | ! CO
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.1
| |
| − | | Is the modelling strategy defined?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.2
| |
| − | | Is the modelling strategy appropriate for the physical problem?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | ! colspan="5" | Solution Strategy
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.3
| |
| − | | Is the code (and version) specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.4
| |
| − | | Are the equations solved described adequately?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.5
| |
| − | | Is the numerical discretisation scheme used specified?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.6
| |
| − | | Is the solution algorithm described?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | ! colspan="5" | Computational Domain
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.7
| |
| − | | Is the domain fully described?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.8
| |
| − | | Boundary conditions fully detailed?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.9
| |
| − | | Is the domain used an idealisation/simplification?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.10
| |
| − | | Is the mesh used fully described?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.11
| |
| − | | Is the mesh quality appropriate?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | ! colspan="5" | Boundary Conditions
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.12
| |
| − | | Are the boundary conditions fully defined?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.13
| |
| − | | Are they appropriate?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.14
| |
| − | | Do these replicate conditions in test rig?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.15
| |
| − | | Were sensitivity runs carried out to explore effects of uncertainties in boundary data?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | ! colspan="5" | Application of physical models
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.16
| |
| − | | Were turbulence models and other physical models applied in an appropriate and consistent way?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | ! colspan="5" | Numerical Accuracy
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.17
| |
| − | | Is there any demonstration/estimation of numerical (discretisation) accuracy?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.18
| |
| − | | Was a mesh sensitivity study carried out?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.19
| |
| − | | Was sufficient iteration convergence achieved?
| |
| − | | align="center" | <span style='color:green'>✔</span>
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="2" |
| |
| − | ! H
| |
| − | ! M
| |
| − | ! L
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | 7.20
| |
| − | | Impact of uncertainties on [[DOAPs#DOAPs:_Design_or_Assessment_Parameters|DOAPs]] ?
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan="5" | <b>Comments</b>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | It was indicated that one of the meshes used had the inflow boundary too far from the model,
| |
| − | resulting in poor results.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | No results of the DOAP’s are given. No information on the free stream values of the turbulent
| |
| − | variables is given.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | No information is available on the numerical dissipation used.
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | CFD2 (Copy and complete this section for each set of CFD data)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | YES
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | NO
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | CO
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.21
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the modelling strategy defined?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.22
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the modelling strategy appropriate for the physical problem?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Solution strategy
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.23
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the code (and version) specified?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.24
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Are the equations solved described adequately?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.25
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the numerical discretisation scheme used specified?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.26
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the solution algorithm described?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Computational Domain
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.27
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the domain fully described?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.28
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Boundary conditions fully detailed?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.29
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the domain used an idealisation/simplification?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.30
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the mesh used fully described?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.31
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the mesh quality appropriate?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Boundary Conditions
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.32
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Are the boundary conditions fully defined?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.33
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Are they appropriate?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.34
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Do these replicate conditions in test rig?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.35
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Were sensitivity runs carried out to explore effects of uncertainties in boundary data?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Application of physical models
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.36
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Were turbulence models and other physical models applied in an appropriate and consistent way?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Numerical Accuracy
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.37
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is there any demonstration/estimation of numerical (discretisation) accuracy?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.38
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Was a mesh sensitivity study carried out?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.39
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Was sufficient iteration convergence achieved?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | H
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | M
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | L
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7.40
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Impact of uncertainties on DOAPs ?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Comments:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The influence of the mesh was studied, and had a considerable impact on the Cd. No grid
| |
| − |
| |
| − | convergence was demonstrated for this parameter (the CL was grid converged).
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 8
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | EVALUATION - Comparison of Test data and CFD
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | YES
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | NO
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | CO
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 8.1
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Is the comparison of CFD and test data clearly presented?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 8.2
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Are the discussion, conclusions and recommendations adequately supported by the available experimental and CFD results?
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Comments:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | No comparisons CFD and test data given in this section, CFD DOAP results are given in
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Section 3.3 and experimental values of the normal force coefficient are provided in Section
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 2.2.4, but no direct comparison between CFD and experimental results is given.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Also surface pressure data, skin friction coefficients, boundary layer and wake velocity
| |
| − |
| |
| − | profiles have been measured, but no comparison with CFD data has been made.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | © copyright ERCOFTAC 2004
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Contributors: Pietro Catalano - CIRA; QinetiQ
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Site Design and Implementation: [[Atkins]] and [[UniS]]
| |
| | | | |
| − | Top Next
| + | {{AC|front=AC 1-02|description=Description_AC1-02|testdata=Test Data_AC1-02|cfdsimulations=CFD Simulations_AC1-02|evaluation=Evaluation_AC1-02|qualityreview=Quality Review_AC1-02|bestpractice=Best Practice Advice_AC1-02|relatedUFRs=Related UFRs_AC1-02}} |
