Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Removed semantic markup.)
Tag: Manual revert
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Description_AC1-05|Description]]  [[Test Data_AC1-05|Test Data]]  [[CFD Simualtions_AC1-05|CFD Simualtions]]  [[Evaluation_AC1-05|Evaluation]] [[Quality Review_AC1-05|Quality Review]] [[Best Practice Advice_AC1-05|Best Practice Advice]]  [[Related UFRs_AC1-05|Related UFRs]]
{{AC|front=AC 1-05|description=Description_AC1-05|testdata=Test Data_AC1-05|cfdsimulations=CFD Simulations_AC1-05|evaluation=Evaluation_AC1-05|qualityreview=Quality Review_AC1-05|bestpractice=Best Practice Advice_AC1-05|relatedUFRs=Related UFRs_AC1-05}}


== Application Area 1: External Aerodynamics ==
== Application Area 1: External Aerodynamics ==
Line 8: Line 8:


==== Abstract ====
==== Abstract ====
A basic ground vehicle type of bluff body is investigated. The body consists of three parts : a fore body, a mid section and a rear end.
A basic ground vehicle type of bluff body is investigated. The body consists of three parts: a fore body, a mid section and a rear end.


Two experiments are available:
Two experiments are available:


A first one (Exp1) is performed at DLR-Göttingen in a wind tunnel at a significant Reynolds number (4.9 million for 60 m/s). The model is mounted near the wall of the wind tunnel, such that a ground effect is present. However, a ground plate is placed between the model and the floor of the wind tunnel in order to minimize this effect. The angle of the rear end slope is adjustable, between 0 and 40° with a step. More details are available for angles of 5, 12.5 and 30°. About 210 pressure locations are available on the fore body, 83 in the mid section and 450 on rear ends. Wall flow visualizations are available. Detailed wake surveys are performed with 10 holes probes. Drag measurements are provided.
A first one (Exp1) is performed at DLR-Göttingen in a wind tunnel at a significant Reynolds number (4.9 million for 60 m/s). The model is mounted near the wall of the wind tunnel, such that a ground effect is present. However, a ground plate is placed between the model and the floor of the wind tunnel in order to minimize this effect. The angle of the rear end slope is adjustable, between 0 and 40° with a 5° step. More details are available for angles of 5, 12.5 and 30°. About 210 pressure locations are available on the fore body, 83 in the mid section and 450 on rear ends. Wall flow visualizations are available. Detailed wake surveys are performed with 10 holes probes. Drag measurements are provided.


A second, more recent experiment (Exp2) is provided by the Erlangen LSTM lab within the MOVA “Models for Vehicle Aerodynamics” European project (TU Delft, Univ. Of Manchester UMIST, LSTM, Electricité de France, AVL List, PSA Peugeot-Citroën). It concerns the same model as in the Ahmed study, running at 40m/s. Two-component LDV is used. Hot wire measurements are performed at 0.38 model length upstream of the model and in the boundary layer. Mean values and turbulence measurements (second and third order moments) are provided for 25° and 35° slant angle. 7,500 discrete positions are provided lying on 13 unique planes. Pressure measurements are performed on the rear part of the model.
A second, more recent experiment (Exp2) is provided by the Erlangen LSTM lab within the MOVA “Models for Vehicle Aerodynamics” European project (TU Delft, Univ. Of Manchester UMIST, LSTM, Electricité de France, AVL List, PSA Peugeot-Citroën). It concerns the same model as in the Ahmed study, running at 40m/s. Two-component LDV is used. Hot wire measurements are performed at 0.38 model length upstream of the model and in the boundary layer. Mean values and turbulence measurements (second and third order moments) are provided for 25° and 35° slant angle. 7,500 discrete positions are provided lying on 13 unique planes. Pressure measurements are performed on the rear part of the model.


CFD results are obtained by use of RANS (k-e and RSM) by the Renault group and TU Delft, LES by LEGI (Grenoble) and EDF,
CFD results are obtained by use of RANS (k-e and RSM) by the Renault group and TU Delft, LES by LEGI (Grenoble) and EDF,


The basic shape of the so-called « Ahmed body » contains all the important features of real road vehicles : a main body, followed by a fully separated region. Prediction of separated flows is one of the more difficult task of CFD. The parametric variation of the angle of the rear part permits the simulation of various configuration relevant to real car characteristics. The complex 3D wake structure is also a challenging problem for CFD. This data base contains also drag results that are essential to predict for practical purposes. The influence of turbulence models as well as the influence of the mesh and numerical scheme can then be tested at several levels : wall pressure, wake structure and force drag.
The basic shape of the so-called “Ahmed body” contains all the important features of real road vehicles: a main body, followed by a fully separated region. Prediction of separated flows is one of the more difficult task of CFD. The parametric variation of the angle of the rear part permits the simulation of various configurations relevant to real car characteristics. The complex 3D wake structure is also a challenging problem for CFD. This data base also contains drag results that are essential to prediction for practical purposes. The influence of turbulence models as well as the influence of the mesh and numerical scheme can then be tested at several levels: wall pressure, wake structure and force drag.


The second set of experiments provides complementary results concerning the turbulent quantities that will be useful for a detailed analysis of turbulence models.
The second set of experiments provides complementary results concerning the turbulent quantities that will be useful for a detailed analysis of turbulence models.
Line 24: Line 24:
The first DOAP is clearly the drag coefficient computed for several slant angles.
The first DOAP is clearly the drag coefficient computed for several slant angles.


A second DOAP is the topology of the flow, particularly the wall streamlines. Comparisons between computations and flow pattern from visualizations on the slant part will be useful. The structure of the flow will be also analyzed from the 3D representations in order to visualize the vortices.
A second DOAP is the topology of the flow, particularly the wall streamlines. Comparisons between computations and flow pattern from visualizations on the slant part will be useful. The structure of the flow will also be analyzed from the 3D representations in order to visualize the vortices.


A third DOAP will be the static pressure distributions.
A third DOAP will be the static pressure distributions.
Line 30: Line 30:
A fourth DOAP will be the mean velocity distributions at several locations around and downstream of the body.
A fourth DOAP will be the mean velocity distributions at several locations around and downstream of the body.


Lastly, the turbulent quantities can be considered as a DOAP, however more in the objective of help to guide for modeling than for a direct validation of codes.
Lastly, the turbulent quantities can be considered as a DOAP; this however is more a guide for modelling than for a direct validation of codes.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----
----
''Contributors: Remi Manceau; Jean-Paul Bonnet - Université de Poitiers''
''Contributors: Remi Manceau; Jean-Paul Bonnet - Université de Poitiers''
{{AC|front=AC 1-05|description=Description_AC1-05|testdata=Test Data_AC1-05|cfdsimulations=CFD Simulations_AC1-05|evaluation=Evaluation_AC1-05|qualityreview=Quality Review_AC1-05|bestpractice=Best Practice Advice_AC1-05|relatedUFRs=Related UFRs_AC1-05}}

Revision as of 11:33, 14 January 2022

Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice

Application Area 1: External Aerodynamics

Application Challenge AC1-05

Abstract

A basic ground vehicle type of bluff body is investigated. The body consists of three parts: a fore body, a mid section and a rear end.

Two experiments are available:

A first one (Exp1) is performed at DLR-Göttingen in a wind tunnel at a significant Reynolds number (4.9 million for 60 m/s). The model is mounted near the wall of the wind tunnel, such that a ground effect is present. However, a ground plate is placed between the model and the floor of the wind tunnel in order to minimize this effect. The angle of the rear end slope is adjustable, between 0 and 40° with a 5° step. More details are available for angles of 5, 12.5 and 30°. About 210 pressure locations are available on the fore body, 83 in the mid section and 450 on rear ends. Wall flow visualizations are available. Detailed wake surveys are performed with 10 holes probes. Drag measurements are provided.

A second, more recent experiment (Exp2) is provided by the Erlangen LSTM lab within the MOVA “Models for Vehicle Aerodynamics” European project (TU Delft, Univ. Of Manchester UMIST, LSTM, Electricité de France, AVL List, PSA Peugeot-Citroën). It concerns the same model as in the Ahmed study, running at 40m/s. Two-component LDV is used. Hot wire measurements are performed at 0.38 model length upstream of the model and in the boundary layer. Mean values and turbulence measurements (second and third order moments) are provided for 25° and 35° slant angle. 7,500 discrete positions are provided lying on 13 unique planes. Pressure measurements are performed on the rear part of the model.

CFD results are obtained by use of RANS (k-e and RSM) by the Renault group and TU Delft, LES by LEGI (Grenoble) and EDF,

The basic shape of the so-called “Ahmed body” contains all the important features of real road vehicles: a main body, followed by a fully separated region. Prediction of separated flows is one of the more difficult task of CFD. The parametric variation of the angle of the rear part permits the simulation of various configurations relevant to real car characteristics. The complex 3D wake structure is also a challenging problem for CFD. This data base also contains drag results that are essential to prediction for practical purposes. The influence of turbulence models as well as the influence of the mesh and numerical scheme can then be tested at several levels: wall pressure, wake structure and force drag.

The second set of experiments provides complementary results concerning the turbulent quantities that will be useful for a detailed analysis of turbulence models.

The first DOAP is clearly the drag coefficient computed for several slant angles.

A second DOAP is the topology of the flow, particularly the wall streamlines. Comparisons between computations and flow pattern from visualizations on the slant part will be useful. The structure of the flow will also be analyzed from the 3D representations in order to visualize the vortices.

A third DOAP will be the static pressure distributions.

A fourth DOAP will be the mean velocity distributions at several locations around and downstream of the body.

Lastly, the turbulent quantities can be considered as a DOAP; this however is more a guide for modelling than for a direct validation of codes.


Contributors: Remi Manceau; Jean-Paul Bonnet - Université de Poitiers


Front Page

Description

Test Data

CFD Simulations

Evaluation

Best Practice Advice