UFR 2-11 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{|align="center" border="1" width="650" | {|align="center" border="1" width="650" | ||
|[[Image:UFR2-11_figure4.gif|UFR2-11_figure4.gif]] | |[[Image:UFR2-11_figure4.gif|UFR2-11_figure4.gif]] | ||
| | |- | ||
|! blah | |||
|} | |} | ||
<br/> | <br/> |
Revision as of 09:40, 7 September 2011
High Reynolds Number Flow around Airfoil in Deep Stall
Flows Around Bodies
Underlying Flow Regime 2-11
Evaluation
Comparison of CFD Calculations with Experiments
A dramatic improvement in solution fidelity for DES compared to URANS, first reported by Shur et al. [22], was observed in the extensive cross-validation exercise carried out in the EU FLOMANIA project [4]. Figure 4 depicts the relative deviation from experimental drag achieved by DES and URANS within this work.
! blah |
Contributed by: Charles Mockett; Misha Strelets — CFD Software GmbH and Technische Universitaet Berlin; New Technologies and Services LLC (NTS) and Saint-Petersburg State University
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024