Template:Demo UFR Test CFD

 Provide an overview of the methods used to analyze the test case.  This
   should   describe   the    codes    employed    together    with    the
   turbulence/physical models examined; the models need not  be  described
   in detail if good references are available but the  treatment  used  at
   the walls should explained. Comment on how well the boundary conditions
   used replicate the conditions in the test rig, e.g.  inflow  conditions
   based on measured data at the rig measurement station or  reconstructed
   based on well-defined estimates and assumptions.

   Discuss the quality and accuracy of the CFD calculations. As before, it
   is recognized that the depth and extent of this discussion is dependent
   upon the amount and quality  of  information  provided  in  the  source
   documents. However the following points should be addressed:

    . What numerical  procedures  were  used  (discretisation  scheme  and
      solver)?

    . What grid resolution was used? Were grid sensitivity studies carried
      out?

    . Did any of the analyses check or demonstrate numerical accuracy?

    . Were  sensitivity  tests  carried  out  to  explore  the  effect  of
      uncertainties in boundary conditions?

    . If separate calculations of the assessment parameters using the same
      physical model have been performed and reported, do they agree  with
      one another?