Template:Demo UFR Test CFD: Difference between revisions

From KBwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " Provide an overview of the methods used to analyze the test case. This should describe the codes employed together with the turbulence/physical mode...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  Provide an overview of the methods used to analyze the test case.  This
Provide an overview of the methods used to analyze the test case.  This
    should  describe  the    codes    employed    together    with    the
should  describe  the    codes    employed    together    with    the
    turbulence/physical models examined; the models need not  be  described
turbulence/physical models examined; the models need not  be  described
    in detail if good references are available but the  treatment  used  at
in detail if good references are available but the  treatment  used  at
    the walls should explained. Comment on how well the boundary conditions
the walls should explained. Comment on how well the boundary conditions
    used replicate the conditions in the test rig, e.g.  inflow  conditions
used replicate the conditions in the test rig, e.g.  inflow  conditions
    based on measured data at the rig measurement station or  reconstructed
based on measured data at the rig measurement station or  reconstructed
    based on well-defined estimates and assumptions.
based on well-defined estimates and assumptions.


    Discuss the quality and accuracy of the CFD calculations. As before, it
Discuss the quality and accuracy of the CFD calculations. As before, it
    is recognized that the depth and extent of this discussion is dependent
is recognized that the depth and extent of this discussion is dependent
    upon the amount and quality  of  information  provided  in  the  source
upon the amount and quality  of  information  provided  in  the  source
    documents. However the following points should be addressed:
documents. However the following points should be addressed:


    . What numerical  procedures  were  used  (discretisation  scheme  and
* What numerical  procedures  were  used  (discretisation  scheme  and solver)?
      solver)?


    . What grid resolution was used? Were grid sensitivity studies carried
* What grid resolution was used? Were grid sensitivity studies carried out?
      out?


    . Did any of the analyses check or demonstrate numerical accuracy?
* Did any of the analyses check or demonstrate numerical accuracy?


    . Were  sensitivity  tests  carried  out  to  explore  the  effect  of
* Were  sensitivity  tests  carried  out  to  explore  the  effect  of uncertainties in boundary conditions?
      uncertainties in boundary conditions?


    . If separate calculations of the assessment parameters using the same
* If separate calculations of the assessment parameters using the same physical model have been performed and reported, do they agree  with one another?
      physical model have been performed and reported, do they agree  with
      one another?

Latest revision as of 10:25, 17 February 2011

Provide an overview of the methods used to analyze the test case. This should describe the codes employed together with the turbulence/physical models examined; the models need not be described in detail if good references are available but the treatment used at the walls should explained. Comment on how well the boundary conditions used replicate the conditions in the test rig, e.g. inflow conditions based on measured data at the rig measurement station or reconstructed based on well-defined estimates and assumptions.

Discuss the quality and accuracy of the CFD calculations. As before, it is recognized that the depth and extent of this discussion is dependent upon the amount and quality of information provided in the source documents. However the following points should be addressed:

  • What numerical procedures were used (discretisation scheme and solver)?
  • What grid resolution was used? Were grid sensitivity studies carried out?
  • Did any of the analyses check or demonstrate numerical accuracy?
  • Were sensitivity tests carried out to explore the effect of uncertainties in boundary conditions?
  • If separate calculations of the assessment parameters using the same physical model have been performed and reported, do they agree with one another?