UFR 4-20 Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
= Evaluation = | = Evaluation = | ||
== Comparison of CFD calculations with experiments == | == Comparison of CFD calculations with experiments == | ||
The results of the steady RANS CFD simulations are compared with the measurement results from the PIV measurements. Figure 7 shows the dimensionless streamwise velocities (U/ | The results of the steady RANS CFD simulations are compared with the measurement results from the PIV measurements. Figure 7 shows the dimensionless streamwise velocities (U/U<sub>M</sub>) along vertical lines at three locations in the vertical center plane (z/L = 0.5) of the enclosure; | ||
x/L = 0.2; x/L = 0.5 and x/L = 0.8, for a slot Reynolds number of ≈ 1,000. Note that the results at x/L = 0.2 (Fig. 7a) are provided for the smaller region of interest, i.e. ROI2, while the other results are provided for the total vertical cross-section, i.e. ROI1. | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 15:13, 5 December 2017
Mixing ventilation flow in an enclosure driven by a transitional wall jet
Confined Flows
Underlying Flow Regime 4-20
Evaluation
Comparison of CFD calculations with experiments
The results of the steady RANS CFD simulations are compared with the measurement results from the PIV measurements. Figure 7 shows the dimensionless streamwise velocities (U/UM) along vertical lines at three locations in the vertical center plane (z/L = 0.5) of the enclosure;
x/L = 0.2; x/L = 0.5 and x/L = 0.8, for a slot Reynolds number of ≈ 1,000. Note that the results at x/L = 0.2 (Fig. 7a) are provided for the smaller region of interest, i.e. ROI2, while the other results are provided for the total vertical cross-section, i.e. ROI1.
Contributed by: T. van Hooff — Eindhoven University of Technology
© copyright ERCOFTAC 2024